Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
1,720 doctors being EU nationals left the UK after Brexit. Over 30,000 nurses being EU nationals left the UK after Brexit some of whom I know personally who left after Brexit. Considering both Tory and Labour are pro Brexit, then this will not be raised in Parliament.
So you are firmly in the poach staff from poorer countries camp then?
So you are firmly in the poach staff from poorer countries camp then?
I'm lets train our own needs.
Same here, we should be training the staff we need to meet our own needs. Dentistry is another area that needs more attention too, my eyes have really been opened when I took mini Spartan to a few University open days over the last few months. Most Universities that run Dentistry course only have 60-70 places a year which is nowhere near enough for a 5 year course.
1,720 doctors being EU nationals left the UK after Brexit. Over 30,000 nurses being EU nationals left the UK after Brexit some of whom I know personally who left after Brexit. Considering both Tory and Labour are pro Brexit, then this will not be raised in Parliament.
Quite a lot of those doctors and nurses left because they couldn't pass the Use of English requirement; something that we couldn't impose prior to Brexit. Given clear communication is fairly necessary when dealing with people, that is not altogether a bad thing.
Quite a lot of those doctors and nurses left because they couldn't pass the Use of English requirement; something that we couldn't impose prior to Brexit. Given clear communication is fairly necessary when dealing with people, that is not altogether a bad thing.
Can you provide a link to that claim?
And not just a link to the Australian company (Cambridge Boxhill Language Assessment Pty Ltd) that the government outsourced the tests to, rather than giving it to a UK tax paying business.
Nearly half of all EU doctors who sought work in the UK in the past year were turned away because they failed to prove their English was good enough, the medical regulator has revealed.
In all, 779 doctors – 45% of those who applied – did not give evidence of their language skills to the General Medical Council (GMC), and were therefore refused a licence to practise, between 25 June 2014 and 6 July this year.
Doesn't look good, although I'd note there's a difference between "failed to prove they had passed" and "couldn't pass"
Also, I see that article is about passing a test that, according to Malvolio, could not have existed in 2015 - when the article was written.
Quite a lot of those doctors and nurses left because they couldn't pass the Use of English requirement; something that we couldn't impose prior to Brexit. Given clear communication is fairly necessary when dealing with people, that is not altogether a bad thing.
So you are firmly in the poach staff from poorer countries camp then?
I'm lets train our own needs.
No, it worked both ways, UK medics and students were getting experience and training in EU countries. This was especially helpful to the UK as university training is cheaper and sometimes free in EU countries. At least with the EU there is freedom of movement both ways but currently under the UK's policy it is one way into the UK.
Ironically, at the time of the Brexit referendum I was listening to a radio documentary about a Dental University in Sofia. They interviewed a non-fee paying English student who was graduating, he was going back to the UK but he said he will vote for Brexit to stop dentists coming to the UK.
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell
Doesn't look good, although I'd note there's a difference between "failed to prove they had passed" and "couldn't pass"
Also, I see that article is about passing a test that, according to Malvolio, could not have existed in 2015 - when the article was written.
Strange if I apply for a job and can't / don't prove I can do it I accept I failed not use weasel words.
I agree Malvolio is wrong, language competency tests were finally instigated when a German doctor actually killed someone because of poor English, before that the lefties were saying it can't be done because of the EU freedom of movement.
The NHS is a classic example of "Price's Law" and until the less productive 90% get a cattle prod up their arse then throwing money at the problem is a criminal waste.
Comment