Originally posted by NigelJK
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Wake up Maggie..
Collapse
X
-
What!?! Was that https://www.fixmystreet.com/ ?"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
yep, it's not just for pot holes
What used to happen was it sent am email to the relevant authority dept when you logged something. Does that still happen?Comment
-
Nope, that's a myth.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostUnfortunately the council guy may have a point there, if it's the same legal principle that if you clear snow from the pavement outside your house and someone slips on the cleared area then they can sue you, whereas they can't if you had just left the snow untouched and they slipped on that!
"You can clear snow and ice from pavements yourself. It’s unlikely that you’ll be sued or held responsible if someone is injured on a path or pavement if you’ve cleared it carefully."
Clear snow from a road, path or cycleway - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
"Furthermore, in the very unlikely case where the intervention does make the situation more risky, it is not enough to show that the passer-by fell over. The passer-by would have to show that he would not have fallen over anyway, or would not have injured himself just as badly in some other way – something that is very hard to do. [..] There is no need for a change in the law. What we need instead is a change in the quality of the people who write and edit newspapers."
Twitpic (letter from David Howarth MP to a constituent in 2010)Comment
-
You can sue anybody for anything. Not the same as saying you'll win.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Unlikely isn't the same as impossible!Originally posted by hobnob View Post
Nope, that's a myth.
"You can clear snow and ice from pavements yourself. It’s unlikely that you’ll be sued or held responsible if someone is injured on a path or pavement if you’ve cleared it carefully."
Clear snow from a road, path or cycleway - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
"Furthermore, in the very unlikely case where the intervention does make the situation more risky, it is not enough to show that the passer-by fell over. The passer-by would have to show that he would not have fallen over anyway, or would not have injured himself just as badly in some other way – something that is very hard to do. [..] There is no need for a change in the law. What we need instead is a change in the quality of the people who write and edit newspapers."
Twitpic (letter from David Howarth MP to a constituent in 2010)Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment