Want to end it all? You'll need to be vaccinated.

[SueEllen]

That could be a viewed as an ad hominem argument. Rather than address the statement made, you address the identity of the person who said it.

That was deliberate as the poster suggests everyone thinks in absolutes like him.

Plus I don't want to get into an abortion debate.

[vetran]

That was deliberate as the poster suggests everyone thinks in absolutes like him.

Plus I don't want to get into an abortion debate.

I don't think in Absolutes, I believe both parents should be part of the decision in an abortion if they wish to. You have suggested men can't be part of the abortion discussion if they can't have babies, who is the one thinking in absolutes?

[NotAllThere]

That was deliberate as the poster suggests everyone thinks in absolutes like him.

Couldn't you just call him a git? It'd be easier to spot then! :-)

[SueEllen]

Couldn't you just call him a git? It'd be easier to spot then! :-)

I'm practicing my online communication skills. This means I don't call people names.

[vetran]

I'm practicing using Gender to drive arguments when logic and reality fails.

FTFY yep a lower opinion is harder to formulate..

[minestrone]

It's the customers who want to die, not the staff. The staff want to be protected from suicidal idiots who don't get vaccinated.

I honestly find it difficult reconciling your views on here with the views you think a Christian should have.

I do not judge, but I find it difficult to imagine a person who has celebrated Christ to have the first consideration on this subject to be 'customers' and 'idiots'.

[minestrone]

Thanks Captain Obvious

Bit like making sure the concentration camp workers are kept safe, really. Wouldn't want them catching something from the people they kill.

Jesus attacked a synagogue full of money changers and got nailed to a cross for it.

He didn't say "thanks captain obvious".

[minestrone]

You seem to be the one angrily preaching. I have shared my opinion, unlike you I'm not making personal attacks making anyone who might think differently that they are idiots for being wrong.

If someone wants to stop taking their medication or remove themself from medical care, that is their choice. And I've already said I think the medical people go too far to preserve life when sometimes it would be best to let it go. But to repeat, anyone with sense can see there's a big difference between not keeping someone alive, and actively helping them die. I lean towards that being the line I draw, but I am happy to disagree.

"I have shared my opinion"

[minestrone]

Maybe educate yourself first on what happens before you start preaching. No one kills anyone else ... the person who is chronically ill and is at end of life and is suffering so much that they no longer want to suffer any further are choosing when their own suffering ends. They administer whatever the drug is themselves.

But hey, if you'd rather see your loved one continue to suffer, in pain and no dignity, when they know they have little time left anyway and they know that their time is already near, then crack on. Guilt them into staying around longer to appease you and watch them die a painful, horrible death.

So, you have a kind of check list when you think people should be killed.

You're convincing me this is ethical.

[NotAllThere]

I honestly find it difficult reconciling your views on here with the views you think a Christian should have.

That's because the views you think I think a Christian should have aren't the views I think a Christian should have.