Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
It really is Kung flu
Collapse
X
-
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
Originally posted by vetran View Post
Doesn't say anywhere that the person doing it has to be qualified to any level. That would be Academia's position.
You mean you accept something as a fact without proof?
Noddy Holder or Big Ears friend? do please try to be specific."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
You should have a good read on why Andrew Wakefield is no longer a doctor and what he did wrong with his research.
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
You know what they say - you can't argue with a fool.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
You know what they say - you can't argue with a fool.
I've compiled it into a nice dataset: https://forums.contractoruk.com/general/Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
possibly you are confusing academia with science. Academia is about stature and science in my opinion is about proving facts.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostIt's not. And don't you see the contradiction talking about "proving facts" and "an opinion"?
Your opinion is that this lady who is more highly qualified in this specialist subject than probably anyone on here and has international renown is wrong because in your OPINION she is underqualified. To prove she is wrong why not try to float some credible ideas or explanation as to why you think she is wrong. I suggested a few that challenge the WHO view. Even a CUK poster can be right occasionally.
The very fact (yes your posts prove them) you are dismissive but unable to counter her ideas does not boost your credibility as an 'expert'.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment