• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

They really don't understand sovereignty do they?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Where the heck did we find negotiators that were better than the French? Apparently our lot couldn't close a deal to save their life - well according to 48% of voters...

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

      I believe the Aussies explicitly asked for a diesel-electric platform. But, yes, the French have nuclear sub technology.
      Yes. I know the French have nuclear sub technology, and the Aussies asked for diesel electric. The question is whether the French would have been willing to share their nuclear technology has the Aussies asked. The implication of a number of reports is that they wouldn't, so when Australia decided nuke subs would be better at combating the Chinese threat, they had to turn to the US and UK.
      Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post

        Yes. I know the French have nuclear sub technology, and the Aussies asked for diesel electric. The question is whether the French would have been willing to share their nuclear technology has the Aussies asked. The implication of a number of reports is that they wouldn't, so when Australia decided nuke subs would be better at combating the Chinese threat, they had to turn to the US and UK.
        No, I think that's wrong. I don't think the French were unwilling to offer it. I think the Aussies wanted Diesel-Electric because, at the time the contract was negotiated, they didn't believe they had the expertise to operate nuclear subs independently. The French platform is nevertheless a bit naff when compared to the UK/US platform, I gather.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

          No, I think that's wrong. I don't think the French were unwilling to offer it. I think the Aussies wanted Diesel-Electric because, at the time the contract was negotiated, they didn't believe they had the expertise to operate nuclear subs independently.
          Fair enough.

          The French platform is nevertheless a bit naff when compared to the UK/US platform, I gather.
          Horses for courses. Diesel/electric, when on electric it's essentially silent. Problem is you have to refuel, and normally you have to surface to recharge the batteries. Nuclear has a heat signature and not as quiet as electric, but can run for decades.

          Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
            Fair enough.

            Horses for courses. Diesel/electric, when on electric it's essentially silent. Problem is you have to refuel, and normally you have to surface to recharge the batteries. Nuclear has a heat signature and not as quiet as electric, but can run for decades.
            Except French nuclear subs need to be refuelled every 10 years
            merely at clientco for the entertainment

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
              Fair enough.

              Horses for courses. Diesel/electric, when on electric it's essentially silent. Problem is you have to refuel, and normally you have to surface to recharge the batteries. Nuclear has a heat signature and not as quiet as electric, but can run for decades.
              No, I meant the French nuclear platform is a bit naff when compared to the UK/US one - I gather that the Barracuda class French sub needs to be refueled every 10 years whereas the UK/US sub has a core life equal to the lifetime of the vessel.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by eek View Post

                Except French nuclear subs need to be refuelled every 10 years
                Yup, that's what I was referring to.

                Comment

                Working...
                X