Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
They really don't understand sovereignty do they?
Collapse
X
-
Where the heck did we find negotiators that were better than the French? Apparently our lot couldn't close a deal to save their life - well according to 48% of voters... -
Yes. I know the French have nuclear sub technology, and the Aussies asked for diesel electric. The question is whether the French would have been willing to share their nuclear technology has the Aussies asked. The implication of a number of reports is that they wouldn't, so when Australia decided nuke subs would be better at combating the Chinese threat, they had to turn to the US and UK.Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
I believe the Aussies explicitly asked for a diesel-electric platform.
But, yes, the French have nuclear sub technology.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
No, I think that's wrong. I don't think the French were unwilling to offer it. I think the Aussies wanted Diesel-Electric because, at the time the contract was negotiated, they didn't believe they had the expertise to operate nuclear subs independently. The French platform is nevertheless a bit naff when compared to the UK/US platform, I gather.Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
Yes. I know the French have nuclear sub technology, and the Aussies asked for diesel electric. The question is whether the French would have been willing to share their nuclear technology has the Aussies asked. The implication of a number of reports is that they wouldn't, so when Australia decided nuke subs would be better at combating the Chinese threat, they had to turn to the US and UK.Comment
-
Fair enough.Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
No, I think that's wrong. I don't think the French were unwilling to offer it. I think the Aussies wanted Diesel-Electric because, at the time the contract was negotiated, they didn't believe they had the expertise to operate nuclear subs independently.
Horses for courses. Diesel/electric, when on electric it's essentially silent. Problem is you have to refuel, and normally you have to surface to recharge the batteries. Nuclear has a heat signature and not as quiet as electric, but can run for decades.The French platform is nevertheless a bit naff when compared to the UK/US platform, I gather.
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Except French nuclear subs need to be refuelled every 10 yearsOriginally posted by NotAllThere View PostFair enough.
Horses for courses. Diesel/electric, when on electric it's essentially silent. Problem is you have to refuel, and normally you have to surface to recharge the batteries. Nuclear has a heat signature and not as quiet as electric, but can run for decades.
merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
No, I meant the French nuclear platform is a bit naff when compared to the UK/US one - I gather that the Barracuda class French sub needs to be refueled every 10 years whereas the UK/US sub has a core life equal to the lifetime of the vessel.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostFair enough.
Horses for courses. Diesel/electric, when on electric it's essentially silent. Problem is you have to refuel, and normally you have to surface to recharge the batteries. Nuclear has a heat signature and not as quiet as electric, but can run for decades.Comment
-
Yup, that's what I was referring to.Originally posted by eek View Post
Except French nuclear subs need to be refuelled every 10 yearsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment