Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
They really don't understand sovereignty do they?
Collapse
X
-
Where the heck did we find negotiators that were better than the French? Apparently our lot couldn't close a deal to save their life - well according to 48% of voters... -
Yes. I know the French have nuclear sub technology, and the Aussies asked for diesel electric. The question is whether the French would have been willing to share their nuclear technology has the Aussies asked. The implication of a number of reports is that they wouldn't, so when Australia decided nuke subs would be better at combating the Chinese threat, they had to turn to the US and UK.Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
I believe the Aussies explicitly asked for a diesel-electric platform.
But, yes, the French have nuclear sub technology.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
No, I think that's wrong. I don't think the French were unwilling to offer it. I think the Aussies wanted Diesel-Electric because, at the time the contract was negotiated, they didn't believe they had the expertise to operate nuclear subs independently. The French platform is nevertheless a bit naff when compared to the UK/US platform, I gather.Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
Yes. I know the French have nuclear sub technology, and the Aussies asked for diesel electric. The question is whether the French would have been willing to share their nuclear technology has the Aussies asked. The implication of a number of reports is that they wouldn't, so when Australia decided nuke subs would be better at combating the Chinese threat, they had to turn to the US and UK.Comment
-
Fair enough.Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
No, I think that's wrong. I don't think the French were unwilling to offer it. I think the Aussies wanted Diesel-Electric because, at the time the contract was negotiated, they didn't believe they had the expertise to operate nuclear subs independently.
Horses for courses. Diesel/electric, when on electric it's essentially silent. Problem is you have to refuel, and normally you have to surface to recharge the batteries. Nuclear has a heat signature and not as quiet as electric, but can run for decades.The French platform is nevertheless a bit naff when compared to the UK/US platform, I gather.
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Except French nuclear subs need to be refuelled every 10 yearsOriginally posted by NotAllThere View PostFair enough.
Horses for courses. Diesel/electric, when on electric it's essentially silent. Problem is you have to refuel, and normally you have to surface to recharge the batteries. Nuclear has a heat signature and not as quiet as electric, but can run for decades.
merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
No, I meant the French nuclear platform is a bit naff when compared to the UK/US one - I gather that the Barracuda class French sub needs to be refueled every 10 years whereas the UK/US sub has a core life equal to the lifetime of the vessel.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostFair enough.
Horses for courses. Diesel/electric, when on electric it's essentially silent. Problem is you have to refuel, and normally you have to surface to recharge the batteries. Nuclear has a heat signature and not as quiet as electric, but can run for decades.Comment
-
Yup, that's what I was referring to.Originally posted by eek View Post
Except French nuclear subs need to be refuelled every 10 yearsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment