Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Halleluiah its raining them
Collapse
X
-
It does? They all sound the same to me but the derogatory terms for the other sex seems to be the common theme.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
-
You know when you state "it all sounds the same"?Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
It does? They all sound the same to me but the derogatory terms for the other sex seems to be the common theme.
It means you are an
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
There are certainly counter-examples, e.g.:Originally posted by northernladuk View PostIt does? They all sound the same to me but the derogatory terms for the other sex seems to be the common theme.
Doc Brown - Real Balls - YouTube
At the start, it seems like stereotypical posturing, but then it goes in a different direction.
As for cover versions in general, I think it's fine for a new version to be different. Arguably there's not much point in having newly recorded music that's indistinguishable from the original. (It's a bit different for live performances.) An interesting example is the "Year 3000" song. The original version by Busted had this lyric: "And your great-great-great-granddaughter is pretty fine". The cover version by the Jonas Brothers just changed one word: "... is doing fine". I thought that was quite well handled - it's a subtle change, and it still fits in with the existing tune, but it changes the emphasis from "Fwoar, yeah, I'd give her one!" to "Hey, good news, your family has prospered".Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Today 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17

Comment