• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Half of London Companies plan for remote working 5 days a week

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Reducing pressure on an already strained tube sounds a great idea. My favourite time to be traveling in London is about 6am, so much nicer.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by eek View Post
      Public transport doesn't work like that - cut train numbers and usage can drop significantly.
      People will walk more to their local parks to feed the greys, that’s the end game and you’ve heard it on here first (as always).

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by AtW View Post

        Les trains per hour will be needed
        Fewer

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
          Fewer

          Comment


            #15
            This could be a once in a lifetime opportunity to solve road congestion and overcrowded trains. All they need to do is maintain current levels of service and reduced number of commuters, whilst throwing a bit of money at public transport to make up the difference in ticket sales.
            What will probably happen instead is that services will be cut, ticket prices increased to compensate for lower sales, whilst commuter numbers creep back up to what they were before - this time with severely curtailed services and even higher prices.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by mattster View Post
              This could be a once in a lifetime opportunity to solve road congestion and overcrowded trains. All they need to do is maintain current levels of service and reduced number of commuters, whilst throwing a bit of money at public transport to make up the difference in ticket sales.
              What will probably happen instead is that services will be cut, ticket prices increased to compensate for lower sales, whilst commuter numbers creep back up to what they were before - this time with severely curtailed services and even higher prices.
              London's transport is already vastly more subsidised than the rest of the country. If you're talking about in general, fine, but Manchester doesn't have the transport infrastructure to encourage people to commute via bus, tram, etc enough.
              The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by LondonManc View Post

                London's transport is already vastly more subsidised than the rest of the country. If you're talking about in general, fine, but Manchester doesn't have the transport infrastructure to encourage people to commute via bus, tram, etc enough.
                I certainly wasn't being London specific, and the road congestion could presumably be improved everywhere with fewer people commuting.

                Nothing wrong with subsidising public transport anywhere, IMO, if having that transport helps generate wealth elsewhere - I'm not even sure you could call that subsidising really, just investment in one area for payoff in another.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by mattster View Post
                  just investment in one area for payoff in another.
                  Public losses with private profits model

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by AtW View Post

                    Les trains per hour will be needed
                    TGV?

                    First Law of Contracting: Only the strong survive

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by ladymuck View Post


                      Originally posted by AtW

                      Les trains per hour will be needed

                      Fewer
                      unless he was talking about the Paris Metro!

                      Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X