Reducing pressure on an already strained tube sounds a great idea. My favourite time to be traveling in London is about 6am, so much nicer.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Half of London Companies plan for remote working 5 days a week
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
People will walk more to their local parks to feed the greys, that’s the end game and you’ve heard it on here first (as always).Originally posted by eek View PostPublic transport doesn't work like that - cut train numbers and usage can drop significantly.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
This could be a once in a lifetime opportunity to solve road congestion and overcrowded trains. All they need to do is maintain current levels of service and reduced number of commuters, whilst throwing a bit of money at public transport to make up the difference in ticket sales.
What will probably happen instead is that services will be cut, ticket prices increased to compensate for lower sales, whilst commuter numbers creep back up to what they were before - this time with severely curtailed services and even higher prices.Comment
-
London's transport is already vastly more subsidised than the rest of the country. If you're talking about in general, fine, but Manchester doesn't have the transport infrastructure to encourage people to commute via bus, tram, etc enough.Originally posted by mattster View PostThis could be a once in a lifetime opportunity to solve road congestion and overcrowded trains. All they need to do is maintain current levels of service and reduced number of commuters, whilst throwing a bit of money at public transport to make up the difference in ticket sales.
What will probably happen instead is that services will be cut, ticket prices increased to compensate for lower sales, whilst commuter numbers creep back up to what they were before - this time with severely curtailed services and even higher prices.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
I certainly wasn't being London specific, and the road congestion could presumably be improved everywhere with fewer people commuting.Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
London's transport is already vastly more subsidised than the rest of the country. If you're talking about in general, fine, but Manchester doesn't have the transport infrastructure to encourage people to commute via bus, tram, etc enough.
Nothing wrong with subsidising public transport anywhere, IMO, if having that transport helps generate wealth elsewhere - I'm not even sure you could call that subsidising really, just investment in one area for payoff in another.Comment
-
Public losses with private profits modelOriginally posted by mattster View Postjust investment in one area for payoff in another.Comment
-
First Law of Contracting: Only the strong surviveComment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment