- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Every single IT project manager at a bank ever
Collapse
X
-
-
Judicial Review is the next stage so it is not over yet."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
Its odd when you sign a contract with an agency that includes a ROS that the Agency and R35 can ignore that. If the client & agency did not intend to honour it. Why can't you after you lose the case sue the agent & client for breach of contract and resultant damages?Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostIts odd when you sign a contract with an agency that includes a ROS that the Agency and R35 can ignore that. If the client & agency did not intend to honour it. Why can't you after you lose the case sue the agent & client for breach of contract and resultant damages?Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
The taxman claimed Lee’s contract with the high street bank fell inside IR35, meaning he was liable to pay National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and Income Tax on earnings from the assignment.Comment
-
It's an interesting thought that a PM can't be substituted as it would take too long to get up to speed ... surely that's the same for any/every role? Even a programmer needs a few days to understand what has gone on before, what requirements are, how the current code looks, dev and release processes etc ..... ?I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by cannon999 View Post
This bit I don't really understand. How is the income tax amount calculated here? I assume this person took out dividends and paid dividend tax on those - is that taken into account? What if they split income with a spouse and their spouse also paid dividend tax?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by cannon999 View Post
This bit I don't really understand. How is the income tax amount calculated here? I assume this person took out dividends and paid dividend tax on those - is that taken into account? What if they split income with a spouse and their spouse also paid dividend tax?
Re divs, it's unrelated. They have been paid and can't claim that tax back. Of course if the contractor does now pay himself 'salary' for these years to reduce his profit (and hence corp tax) he will now have a bigger personal tax liability as he also took out divis the same tax year.
All very messy ... I'm probably wrong on some of this as just thinking off top of my head, but needs some proper thinking to get this right for the contractor.
This is one reason I closed my LTD down a few years ago and just go umbrella now - costs more, but at least I'm not going to get that knock on the door any more. I think contracting as we've known it for the past 20 years is over, welcome to the new world of a virtually bankrupt country that needs to squeeze high earners until they squeak!I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostIt's an interesting thought that a PM can't be substituted as it would take too long to get up to speed ... surely that's the same for any/every role? Even a programmer needs a few days to understand what has gone on before, what requirements are, how the current code looks, dev and release processes etc ..... ?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
I think we've had a few posts on this but can't remember the exact outcome. Won't they just take the gross amount of income and tax it as inside and then just demand that figure back minus taxes already paid? I seem to remember in one of the posts something about them not even taking in to account taxes paid but I don't know if that was just a discussion point or whoever mentioned it referred to a case or not.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment