Why are they allowed on here? The only reason for a sockie is to troll. Why aren't they named and shamed as soon as identified, and duly blocked?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Sockies
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Been shamed many times ....but not named yetOriginally posted by BR14 View Postyou're still here aren't you?

I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man
Comment
-
I don't mind an entertaining sockie. It's just that the current batch aren't all that entertaining.Comment
-
-
That's not saying a lot.Originally posted by Lola View PostI have more friends than my sockie master.
When the fun stops, STOP.Comment
-
Hi SASOriginally posted by Lola View PostI have more friends than my sockie master.
Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !Comment
-
Always wondered that myself. I get that some people find them mildly interesting for awhile but if it's from the Gricer stable it always ends the same way, benign posts for awhile, becomes a pain and ends up annoying most on the forum and a long delay before mods finally pull the trigger. The fact they won't pull the trigger early enough means the sockie causes more harm than good. My question would be, if you are going allow them to post while they are interesting why will the mods not get rid the minute it doesn't. Why do you give a sockie the benefit of the doubt? How does that help as it always ends up being banned anyway?Originally posted by Whorty View PostWhy are they allowed on here? The only reason for a sockie is to troll. Why aren't they named and shamed as soon as identified, and duly blocked?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Comment
-
or JTB etc... There is a good point there to be fair.Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View PostAny entertainment is better than LondonPM'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment