Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
revisionism is well under way.
Collapse
X
-
-
That's how you're hiding your defeat.Originally posted by vetran View Postno concession I just can't be bothered to reply to your drivel any more on this thread.Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThat's how you're hiding your defeat.
Your obsession with my ass is noted.Comment
-
As is your inability to understand metaphors.Originally posted by vetran View PostYour obsession with my ass is noted.Comment
-
But you post so much, surely you're used to drivel? Perhaps I should ban drivel - or would that be censorship.Originally posted by vetran View Postno concession I just can't be bothered to reply to your drivel any more on this thread.
I just can't navigate this woke world anymore.
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Under the Equality Act, you would need to make a reasonable adjustment for vetran. Essentially you could only ban him for what would be drivel in relation to his own usual standards.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostBut you post so much, surely you're used to drivel? Perhaps I should ban drivel - or would that be censorship.
I just can't navigate this woke world anymore.
Comment
-
Hmm. If I banned people according to my standards, that'd leave no one. Including me. But what's drivel according to his usual standards - they do keep dropping, so eventually I'd be unable to ban anything.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostUnder the Equality Act, you would need to make a reasonable adjustment for vetran. Essentially you could only ban him for what would be drivel in relation to his own usual standards.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
If he is indeed suffering from degenerative cretinism, then you need to make adjustments that take the degenerative nature of the affliction into account.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostHmm. If I banned people according to my standards, that'd leave no one. Including me. But what's drivel according to his usual standards - they do keep dropping, so eventually I'd be unable to ban anything.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Today 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Comment