- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Second Wave
Collapse
X
-
-
Generally speaking, it can take 10 years and billions of dollars to bring a new drug to market.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostProbably a few tens of dollars knowing how these patent holding drug companies gouge the market.
What model do you suggest for getting that investment back?
No new drugs were ever developed in the old Soviet Union, AFAIK.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
In a global public health emergency, countries can legislate to ignore the patent. Benefits would outweigh the (genuine) drawbacks you allude to.Originally posted by sasguru View PostGenerally speaking, it can take 10 years and billions of dollars to bring a new drug to market.
What model do you suggest for getting that investment back?
No new drugs were ever developed in the old Soviet Union, AFAIK.Comment
-
I find that hard to swallow.Originally posted by sasguru View PostNo new drugs were ever developed in the old Soviet Union, AFAIK.
Comment
-
Isn't this why the government is investing in the R&D to find suitable medical solutions? The government doesn't need to get its investment back in the first instance because their first priority is protecting the population and secondly ensuring the international drugs business aids the UK economy.Originally posted by sasguru View PostGenerally speaking, it can take 10 years and billions of dollars to bring a new drug to market.
What model do you suggest for getting that investment back?
No new drugs were ever developed in the old Soviet Union, AFAIK.Comment
-
The Govt first, second and third priorities is to keep their own arses in power - there is no incentive for them to make long term decisions, this system is designed for massive repeated failures.Originally posted by tazdevil View PostIsn't this why the government is investing in the R&D to find suitable medical solutions? The government doesn't need to get its investment back in the first instance because their first priority is protecting the population and secondly ensuring the international drugs business aids the UK economy.Comment
-
The best route to an anti-viral is to identify an existing medication that is effective for Covid-19. This wouldn't require development, and its safety (and risks / side effects) would already be understood for the general population. If such a drug is identified (and it's a big IF, but there are plenty of hopeful candidates), then individual countries have a choiceOriginally posted by tazdevil View PostIsn't this why the government is investing in the R&D to find suitable medical solutions? The government doesn't need to get its investment back in the first instance because their first priority is protecting the population and secondly ensuring the international drugs business aids the UK economy.
1. Do they respect the patent and pay what they have to?
2. Do they use their sovereign power to ignore the patent and produce it themselves (or license companies to produce it)?
3. Do they use the threat of 2 to significantly drive down the cost?Comment
-
Nice bit of Darwinism in action.Originally posted by AtW View PostHopefully he is right, but it won't be safe enough to use on mass scale, only for health workers and others who under much higher risk.
And then there are anti-vaxxers, who will be out in force with their tin foil hats.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
French have found a cure!
French researchers to test nicotine patches on coronavirus patients | World news | The Guardian
Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- VAT compliance checks are changing — here’s what contractors need to know Jun 17 07:30
- As HMRC steps up VAT compliance activity, how should company directors prepare? Jun 16 06:52
- Hiring of IT contractors returned to growth in May 2026, following 33 months ‘in the red’ Jun 15 06:02
- Zero Hours Contract Reform: A key consultation for recruiters, employers and contractors is finally here Jun 12 04:43
- Bills of Exchange: Here’s what caught my attention as an umbrella compliance expert Jun 11 03:46
- Loan charge recall issue returns, with new demands making UK contractors ‘half-suicidal’ Jun 10 03:58
- AI interviews are here. Here's how IT contractors can ace them Jun 9 06:53
- Closing your limited company isn't failure. It's just the end of a chapter. Jun 8 05:00
- Young people not in education, employment or training isn’t a contractor’s problem. It’s a problem for us all Jun 5 05:26
- How does HMRC’s forward interest change benefit contractors? Jun 4 04:22

Comment