- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Second Wave
Collapse
X
-
-
Generally speaking, it can take 10 years and billions of dollars to bring a new drug to market.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostProbably a few tens of dollars knowing how these patent holding drug companies gouge the market.
What model do you suggest for getting that investment back?
No new drugs were ever developed in the old Soviet Union, AFAIK.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
In a global public health emergency, countries can legislate to ignore the patent. Benefits would outweigh the (genuine) drawbacks you allude to.Originally posted by sasguru View PostGenerally speaking, it can take 10 years and billions of dollars to bring a new drug to market.
What model do you suggest for getting that investment back?
No new drugs were ever developed in the old Soviet Union, AFAIK.Comment
-
I find that hard to swallow.Originally posted by sasguru View PostNo new drugs were ever developed in the old Soviet Union, AFAIK.
Comment
-
Isn't this why the government is investing in the R&D to find suitable medical solutions? The government doesn't need to get its investment back in the first instance because their first priority is protecting the population and secondly ensuring the international drugs business aids the UK economy.Originally posted by sasguru View PostGenerally speaking, it can take 10 years and billions of dollars to bring a new drug to market.
What model do you suggest for getting that investment back?
No new drugs were ever developed in the old Soviet Union, AFAIK.Comment
-
The Govt first, second and third priorities is to keep their own arses in power - there is no incentive for them to make long term decisions, this system is designed for massive repeated failures.Originally posted by tazdevil View PostIsn't this why the government is investing in the R&D to find suitable medical solutions? The government doesn't need to get its investment back in the first instance because their first priority is protecting the population and secondly ensuring the international drugs business aids the UK economy.Comment
-
The best route to an anti-viral is to identify an existing medication that is effective for Covid-19. This wouldn't require development, and its safety (and risks / side effects) would already be understood for the general population. If such a drug is identified (and it's a big IF, but there are plenty of hopeful candidates), then individual countries have a choiceOriginally posted by tazdevil View PostIsn't this why the government is investing in the R&D to find suitable medical solutions? The government doesn't need to get its investment back in the first instance because their first priority is protecting the population and secondly ensuring the international drugs business aids the UK economy.
1. Do they respect the patent and pay what they have to?
2. Do they use their sovereign power to ignore the patent and produce it themselves (or license companies to produce it)?
3. Do they use the threat of 2 to significantly drive down the cost?Comment
-
Nice bit of Darwinism in action.Originally posted by AtW View PostHopefully he is right, but it won't be safe enough to use on mass scale, only for health workers and others who under much higher risk.
And then there are anti-vaxxers, who will be out in force with their tin foil hats.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
French have found a cure!
French researchers to test nicotine patches on coronavirus patients | World news | The Guardian
Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Jul 2 05:09
- Crypto tax and contractors: What HMRC’s new cryptoasset research really means Jul 1 04:03
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Jul 1 04:03
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Jun 30 03:38
- UK IT Contractors: How to land Forward Deployed Engineer roles beyond Palantir, Anthropic and OpenAI Jun 29 05:52
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 25 03:52
- The beginning of the end for Boox ‘MSC’ contractors has begun. Check back in 2031 Jun 24 06:25

Comment