Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Should Mark Field be charged with assault?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
The smaller the penis, the more violent the action.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostInadequate self-entitled gammons react violently, it seems.
Composition that is. Inheritance wise he is a huge dick.
It says alot about those who elect such idiots.Comment
-
This is just idiotic; context matters.Originally posted by WTFH View PostIf the answer is "but they could have been dangerous" then that justifies assault on anyone.
Most people ignored the murder of Theo van Gogh in the streets. The world doesn't operate like it does in your head.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostIf she was so dangerous why did everyone else ignore her ?Comment
-
She wasn't murdering anyone. She was walking, but she was clearly a lefty Liberal.Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View PostThis is just idiotic; context matters.
Most people ignored the murder of Theo van Gogh in the streets. The world doesn't operate like it does in your head.I'm alright JackComment
-
You're missing the point, which is the general behaviour of people: Why don't people intervene? - OpenLearn - Open UniversityOriginally posted by BlasterBates View PostShe wasn't murdering anyone. She was walking, but she was clearly a lefty Liberal.Comment
-
It is fairly shocking that everyone just sat around and watched Field's violence.Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View PostYou're missing the point, which is the general behaviour of people: Why don't people intervene? - OpenLearn - Open UniversityComment
-
There was no reason to lunge and go for the throat, however as the protestor points out a course in anger management should sort him out.Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View PostYou're missing the point, which is the general behaviour of people: Why don't people intervene? - OpenLearn - Open UniversityI'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostTimely.
she wasn't invited and was aware she was required to leave.
Trespass in English law - Wikipedia
Trespass to land involves the "unjustifiable interference with land which is in the immediate and exclusive possession of another";[6] it is both a tort and, in certain circumstances, a crime under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. It is not necessary to prove that harm was suffered to bring a claim, and is instead actionable per se. While most trespasses to land are intentional, the courts have decided that it could also be committed negligently. Accidental trespass also incurs liability.
She was making her way towards the podium where it was likely that that people would feel threatened. There were more than 12 who were willing to resist expulsion so Riot is possible.
Public Order Offences incorporating the Charging Standard | The Crown Prosecution Service
so yes on the published facts she appears guilty.Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Today 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Yesterday 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11

Comment