Ir35 - hmrc

[GhostofTarbera]

Interesting article from a whistle blower

IR35 HMRC Exemption - Contractor Weekly

Anyone confirm the HSBC news ?


Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

[Old Greg]

The writer sounds like a disguised employee. NLUK will go nuts.

[FrontEnder]

It sounds like they don't understand the off payroll rules. HMRC aren't saying they are exempt from the law, they have applied the law and decided that their workers are outside IR35.

[mudskipper]

It sounds like they don't understand the off payroll rules. HMRC aren't saying they are exempt from the law, they have applied the law and decided that their workers are outside IR35.

Agree with this. Sounds like a misunderstanding.

[northernladuk]

https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...side-ir35.html

[Lockhouse]

Could be good if spun correctly though. No sense in holding back.

[Old Greg]

It sounds like they don't understand the off payroll rules. HMRC aren't saying they are exempt from the law, they have applied the law and decided that their workers are outside IR35.

That's all rather convenient.

[FrontEnder]

That's all rather convenient.

If they engage with their suppliers in the correct way (i.e. so that they are actually outside IR35), I don't see the problem. If they're treating them like employees, then that's not great.

[BoredBloke]

It sounds like they don't understand the off payroll rules. HMRC aren't saying they are exempt from the law, they have applied the law and decided that their workers are outside IR35.

Sounds more like HMRC said they would all be in scope of IR35 and they all left. Then HMRC advertised the jobs as inside with no takers. Then only got them back once they determined that the roles were outside.

[BrilloPad]

Sounds more like HMRC said they would all be in scope of IR35 and they all left. Then HMRC advertised the jobs as inside with no takers. Then only got them back once they determined that the roles were outside.

HMRC still claimed it as a total success.....