• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Girl killed by pit bull terrier

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    The blame lies neither with the child nor the dog, both of whom were probably doing what their natural instncts told them to do. The blame lies firmly with the idiot who decided to leave such a potentially lethal combination together unsupervised.

    I've got a four year old child and I wouldn't dream of leaving him unsupervised in the company of an animal that I would struggle to overpower if it turned nasty (and I wouldn't be naturally curious enough to be pulling its tail / ears / whatever).
    Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Alf W
      The blame lies firmly with the idiot who decided to leave such a potentially lethal combination together unsupervised.
      Agreed. And who lets a five year old kid and a dog wander around the house at 4:30 in the morning. Parenting at its best.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Denny
        What's in a name. The point I made is still equally valid. Staffies are still mistaken for the Pit Bulls that are dangerous.

        If you are going to make a point, make one. Don't split hairs.

        The reason they are mistaken for the other breeds much of the time is because people who don't know the breed don't make the distinction, or use the wrong name to describe them. By describing them as "Staffordshire Pit Bull Terriers" you put entirely the wrong emphasis on the breed. Rightly or wrongly people see the words "Pit Bull" in any context and assume the dog concerned is a dangerous breed. Yes Staffies can look intimidating, especially when kitted out with ridiculous harnesses or studded collars but so can almost any other dog. Describing them as a Pit Bull type is wrong and only serves to confuse those people not familiar with the breed.
        "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

        Comment


          #24
          I have to say chaps. Reading that link has made me think that perhaps this is the type of Forum we should take our next holiday to.

          A dog lovers forum where we play devils advocate.....
          What happens in General, stays in General.
          You know what they say about assumptions!

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by MarillionFan
            I have to say chaps. Reading that link has made me think that perhaps this is the type of Forum we should take our next holiday to.

            A dog lovers forum where we play devils advocate.....
            But I hate dogs!

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by DaveB
              The reason they are mistaken for the other breeds much of the time is because people who don't know the breed don't make the distinction, or use the wrong name to describe them. By describing them as "Staffordshire Pit Bull Terriers" you put entirely the wrong emphasis on the breed. Rightly or wrongly people see the words "Pit Bull" in any context and assume the dog concerned is a dangerous breed. Yes Staffies can look intimidating, especially when kitted out with ridiculous harnesses or studded collars but so can almost any other dog. Describing them as a Pit Bull type is wrong and only serves to confuse those people not familiar with the breed.
              I described the difference quite fully and adequately, therefore I still don't see your point.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by wendigo100
                But I hate dogs!
                I don't hate dogs, but I think they are utterly cowardly and despicable.

                On my grand-dad's small-holding (circa 1965) , we had several dogs of various sizes, a large population of laying hens, a thriving colony of cats to keep the vermin down, and assorted goats, pigs and other critters.

                The essential and well-understood hierarchy amongst these animals was: -

                1) Humans (big or small ones)
                2) A mature and formidable ginger tom cat ("Rufus")
                3) "Rooster Number 1" (a one-legged, agressive, mental cock bird)
                4) Yappy, hyperactive Jack Russell bitch ("Trixy")
                5) Vicious and smelly billy goat ("Jasper")
                6) Large, elderly black and white spotted male dog of uncertain parentage ("Patch")
                7) Wives and offspring of #2 above
                8) Pigs and other ungulates (intelligent, yet utterly unambitious)
                9) Sundry nanny goats and their kids
                10) Horses (not much brains)
                11) Sheep (no brains at all)

                The Dogs on the plot grew up to recognise the authority of humans, cats, goats and any other creature that had the strength of will to put them in their place. They yapped and snarled and bayed at anything that didn't stand up to them.

                Dogs want leadership. They don't want to be boss - they want you (or anyone other than them) to be the boss.

                When dogs find that they are the boss, they lose it completely!
                Last edited by bogeyman; 2 January 2007, 19:27.

                You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Why would anyone want a dog?

                  A/ They smell of sh1t
                  B/ They make your house smell sh1t
                  C/ They sniff and lick sh1t and then lick your face
                  D/ They eat everything, including furniture
                  E/ They are really really stupid
                  The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

                  But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Because they keep the local cat vermin problem down
                    How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Troll
                      Because they keep the local cat vermin problem down
                      They don't though do they? My cat used to chase dogs.

                      DOgs stink, at least cats are clean, and don't sh1t all over the footpath
                      The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

                      But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X