Unnamed person arrested and sent straight to jail under media blackout

[sasguru]

Some reports of Tommy's court case which emerged yesterday (taken from inside court - all unconfirmed):

"Judge stated he hadn't watched the full live stream, he'd only watched a brief moment of it (a couple of seconds)"
"Judge stated 'Freedom of speech comes with consequences'"
"Judge stated 13 month sentence would have been awarded regardless of previous suspended sentence - 'previous sentence irrelevant'"
"Judge running the grooming trial was the person who sentenced Tommy"

I understand one of the jurors went commando. And a unicorn briefly made an appearance for the defence. Unconfirmed.
The fact that you're an imbecile. Confirmed.

[SunnyInHades]

I understand one of the jurors went commando. And a unicorn briefly made an appearance for the defence. Unconfirmed.

Those are statements released by Tommy Robinson's camera man, Caolan Robertson, who was with Tommy on site when filming the stream.
Of course, everything Caolan says could be lies and propaganda.

Here's the video released yesterday where he makes the statements...

[vwdan]

Some reports of Tommy's court case which emerged yesterday (taken from inside court - all unconfirmed):

"Judge stated he hadn't watched the full live stream, he'd only watched a brief moment of it (a couple of seconds)"
"Judge stated 'Freedom of speech comes with consequences'"
"Judge stated 13 month sentence would have been awarded regardless of previous suspended sentence - 'previous sentence irrelevant'"
"Judge running the grooming trial was the person who sentenced Tommy"

Judge Geoffrey Marson, QC, said:

"No one could possibly conclude that it would be anything other than highly prejudicial to the defendants’ in the trial. I respect everyone’s right to free speech. That’s one of the most important rights that we have. With those rights come responsibilities. The responsibility to exercise that freedom of speech within the law. I am not sure you appreciate the potential consequence of what you have done.

If the jurors in my present trial get to know of this video I will do doubt be faced with an application to discharge the jury. If I have to do that it will mean a re-trial, costing hundreds and hundreds and thousands of pounds."

Read more at: https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co....lity-1-9184611

But, still, don't let daft things like the truth get in the way of you frothing at the mouth and looking stupid.

His sentencing remarks from last year also make for some interesting reading:

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-cont...n-20170522.pdf

He knew exactly what he was doing:

In short, Mr. Yaxley-Lennon, turn up at another court,
refer to people as "Muslim paedophiles, Muslim
rapists" and so on and so forth while trials are
ongoing and before there has been a finding by a jury
that that is what they are, and you will find yourself
inside. Do you understand? Thank you very much.

Of course, people will continue to defend him and cry about it because people are ******* idiots.

[WTFH]

But, still, don't let daft things like the truth get in the way of you frothing at the mouth and looking stupid.

His sentencing remarks from last year also make for some interesting reading:

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-cont...n-20170522.pdf

He knew exactly what he was doing:



Of course, people will continue to defend him and cry about it because people are ******* idiots.

But that's all fake, we need to click on videos, because the more clicks, the higher up the search engine results, and the more advertising money that flows into the coffers of his supporters as they continue to hate and disrupt the British justice system.

[original PM]

Some reports of Tommy's court case which emerged yesterday (taken from inside court - all unconfirmed):

"Judge stated he hadn't watched the full live stream, he'd only watched a brief moment of it (a couple of seconds)"
"Judge stated 'Freedom of speech comes with consequences'"
"Judge stated 13 month sentence would have been awarded regardless of previous suspended sentence - 'previous sentence irrelevant'"
"Judge running the grooming trial was the person who sentenced Tommy"

Erm

Isn't there a bit of definition that if it is free it kind of comes without consequences?

Anyway not defending this Tommy guy or whatever his name is, he seems to be a tit.

'free
friː/Submit
adjective
1.
able to act or be done as one wishes; not under the control of another.
"I have no ambitions other than to have a happy life and be free"
2.
not or no longer confined or imprisoned.
"the researchers set the birds free"
synonyms: on the loose, at liberty, at large; More'

[DaveB]

Erm

Isn't there a bit of definition that if it is free it kind of comes without consequences?

Anyway not defending this Tommy guy or whatever his name is, he seems to be a tit.

'free
friː/Submit
adjective
1.
able to act or be done as one wishes; not under the control of another.
"I have no ambitions other than to have a happy life and be free"
2.
not or no longer confined or imprisoned.
"the researchers set the birds free"
synonyms: on the loose, at liberty, at large; More'

The important bit here is that the judge didn't actually say that. It's just convenient paraphrasing from the idiots supporters.

What he actually said was, as posted above :

Judge Geoffrey Marson, QC, said:

"No one could possibly conclude that it would be anything other than highly prejudicial to the defendants’ in the trial. I respect everyone’s right to free speech. That’s one of the most important rights that we have. With those rights come responsibilities. The responsibility to exercise that freedom of speech within the law. I am not sure you appreciate the potential consequence of what you have done.

If the jurors in my present trial get to know of this video I will do doubt be faced with an application to discharge the jury. If I have to do that it will mean a re-trial, costing hundreds and hundreds and thousands of pounds."

Read more at: https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co....lity-1-9184611

[DaveB]

Those are statements released by Tommy Robinson's camera man, Caolan Robertson, who was with Tommy on site when filming the stream.
Of course, everything Caolan says could be lies and propaganda.

Here's the video released yesterday where he makes the statements...

Ah yes, this delightful individual. Hangs out with those bastions of patriotism and honour Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen. Lately of Britain First and currently doing time for racially aggravated harassment which involved hammering on some poor families door and screaming that they were peadophiles and foreigners at them and their kids. His "style of journalism" is to take any incident and add "it was the Islam's that done it" on the end.

A trustworthy and reliable source if ever I saw one

Doesn't much like the LBGT crowd either.

[northernladuk]

But, still, don't let daft things like the truth get in the way of you frothing at the mouth and looking stupid.

His sentencing remarks from last year also make for some interesting reading:

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-cont...n-20170522.pdf

He knew exactly what he was doing:



Of course, people will continue to defend him and cry about it because people are ******* idiots.

He says the same thing about not doing exactly the same thing more than once so it can't really be any clearer can it.

He also says exactly what the case is about and the first thing he says is it isn't about free speech. Maybe if anyone complaining about his right to free speech should be giving this to read. Might shut them up.

This contempt hearing is not about free speech. This is not about the freedom of the press. This is not about legitimate journalism; this is not about political correctness; this is not about whether one political viewpoint is right or another. It is about justice, and it is about ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly. It is about ensuring that a jury are not in any way inhibited from carrying out their important function. It is about being innocent until proven guilty. It is not about people prejudging a situation and going round to that court and publishing material, whether in print or online, referring to defendants as "Muslim paedophile rapists". A legitimate journalist would not be able to do that and under the strict liability rule there would be no defence to publication in those terms. It is pejorative language which prejudges the case, and it is language and reporting - if reporting indeed is what it is - that could have had the effect of substantially derailing the trial. As I have already
indicated, because of what I knew was going on I had to take avoiding action in order to make sure that the integrity of this trial was preserved, that justice was preserved and that the trial could continue to completion without people being intimidated into reaching conclusions about it, or into being affected by "irresponsible and inaccurate reporting". If something of the nature of that which you put out on social media had been put into the mainstream press I would have been faced with applications from the advocates concerned, I have no doubt, to either say something specific to the jury, or worse, to abandon the trial and to start again. That is the kind of thing that actions such as these can and do have, and that is why you have been dealt with in the way in which you have and why I am dealing with this case with the seriousness which I am.

[original PM]

So if I get this right this idiot was outside court making a video and trying to pass it of as 'news' and in that video he accused the 'accused' of being 'pedo muslim rapists' and that is contempt of court as it could remove the impartiality of the jury.

Is that about right?

[Jog On]

So if I get this right this idiot was outside court making a video and trying to pass it of as 'news' and in that video he accused the 'accused' of being 'pedo muslim rapists' and that is contempt of court as it could remove the impartiality of the jury.

Is that about right?

Pretty much sums it up. Followed by outcry of people saying free speech is being censored.