Originally posted by washed up contractor
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
HMRC's time machine setting sights on all graduates!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by tiggat View PostSnowflake brigade out in force, if we have had to pay for our education why shouldn't our elders?
Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostWalk away from the discussion. Probably best. I can't work out if you have now worked out that there is no retrospective taxation, or if you're too stupid. Doesn't really matter, I guess.Comment
-
Originally posted by tiggat View PostSnowflake brigade out in force, if we have had to pay for our education why shouldn't our elders?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostBecause elders vote and young people do not.Comment
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostI'm glad I dropped out. Simply wasting tax payers money on the education (I never turned up for) and all that lovely full grant money I spent on sex, drugs and rock'n'roll.
EDIT : Someone on the news earlier was saying that there is no record of who got a degree prior to 2005 anyway so there's a good cutoff date"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by vwdan View PostTrick question - as there's nobody around the monkey simply spends all day on AndyW's Mum
has to be an optionComment
-
Why is this an issue? I studied for my degree in the 80's and have absolutely no problem with this. If we expect the current generation to pay a tax for their degree it only seems fair that we do too. An extra 5% or so on future earnings isn't such a hardship for contractors on 100k + a year, surely?I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
The proposal to retrospectively pay tax for university education is of course ridiculous and if you only pay tax for education or public services that you used, I want to pay less tax as well as my children have private education and my family has private health insuranceComment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostWhy is this an issue? I studied for my degree in the 80's and have absolutely no problem with this. If we expect the current generation to pay a tax for their degree it only seems fair that we do too. An extra 5% or so on future earnings isn't such a hardship for contractors on 100k + a year, surely?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment