• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Moon Landings

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    We can expect these questions to continue as the UK produces more and more art and media graduates in the absence of engineers and scientists.

    Consider this.. you don't spend 4.67 billion man-hours on a elaborate theatre production.
    Not these days you don't. You do it with CGI
    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
      ok I am skeptical

      my reason is, if we could land on the moon in the 60's then why haven't we been back since ?

      Milan.
      What a load of bollocks hypothesis. The US sent Apollo 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 & 17 to the moon. All but 8, 10 & 13 landed. 8 was to test Lunar inception and return was possible. 10 was to test descent via the Lunar Module and return was possible. 13 aborted the mission to the 'problem.' The missions lasted into the 70's until NASA's budget was cut.

      Anyone was has seen 1960's / 70's 'special effects' in sci fi films knows they couldnt have been filmed in a studio.

      I love to destroy doubters and conspiracists over the Moon landings. Not one has been able to correctly answer these relatively simple questions; given the times of the Lunar landings, how many stars do you expect to see in the landing sites background and why?
      Last edited by washed up contractor; 15 September 2017, 13:53.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by Lance View Post
        Real or faked?

        Please state the strongest factor influencing your conclusion.
        Obviously real....

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by Paddy View Post
          Space is deep.

          Comment


            #45
            England's greatest sailor since Nelson lost the armada.

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by washed up contractor View Post
              What a load of bollocks hypothesis. The US sent Apollo 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 & 17 to the moon. All but 8, 10 & 13 landed. 8 was to test Lunar inception and return was possible. 10 was to test descent via the Lunar Module and return was possible. 13 aborted the mission to the 'problem.' The missions lasted into the 70's until NASA's budget was cut.

              Anyone was has seen 1960's / 70's 'special effects' in sci fi films knows they couldnt have been filmed in a studio.

              I love to destroy doubters and conspiracists over the Moon landings. Not one has been able to correctly answer these relatively simple questions; given the times of the Lunar landings, how many stars do you expect to see in the landing sites background and why?
              You go, girl!

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
                You go, girl!
                Speak for yourself.

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by washed up contractor View Post
                  Speak for yourself.
                  Ladies and gentlemen, the pole choker is back in town.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
                    Ladies and gentlemen, the pole choker is back in town.
                    And off -topic.
                    See You Next Tuesday

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Lance View Post
                      And off -topic.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X