- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Moon Landings
Collapse
X
-
-
Money and politics in that order.Originally posted by milanbenes View Postok I am skeptical
my reason is, if we could land on the moon in the 60's then why haven't we been back since ?
Cost loads of money to go into space. There was a recession in the 70s.
If the US isn't doing stuff then the Russians didn't need to compete."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostReal or faked?
Please state the strongest factor influencing your conclusion.
*yes I'm procrastinating more useful tasks*
Anyone who considers that the Moon landing were fake must be the most stupid ignorant [insert word] possible. As for the pseudo-science that skeptics show; it is not even worth time to explain why they are wrong other than, please go and study science.
One factor which I can recall at the time were the radio signals from the Moon. You cannot fake that as any ham radio enthusiast will know."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
They didn't find anyoilcheese, so there's no reason to go back.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
How many people do you know who received the radio signals?Originally posted by Paddy View PostAnyone who considers that the Moon landing were fake must be the most stupid ignorant [insert word] possible. As for the pseudo-science that skeptics show; it is not even worth time to explain why they are wrong other than, please go and study science.
One factor which I can recall at the time were the radio signals from the Moon. You cannot fake that as any ham radio enthusiast will know.Comment
-
The radio signals are my candidate for strongest evidence. It's why USSR announced the frequency that Sputnik was broadcasting so the whole world could witness it.Originally posted by Paddy View Post
One factor which I can recall at the time were the radio signals from the Moon. You cannot fake that as any ham radio enthusiast will know.See You Next TuesdayComment
-

qhHe had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.
I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostNicks stuffThinking is what puts the Sapien in Homo Sapien. Without that you're just a Homo.
Comment
-
This may be interestingOriginally posted by northernladyuk View PostHow many people do you know who received the radio signals?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kettering_Grammar_School"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
I remember watching one of the later moon walks on TV, then going outside and looking up at the moon. It was amazing to think that as I stood there looking up, there were two blokes walking around up there
I must have been about seven or eight.
It's a shame we've not been back, but I suppose it was very important to spend all the money onfighting to protect civilisationpetty squabbles over oil down here instead
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment