It is good to see that sense has prevailed. Crazy situation to be put in.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
This will probably not end well.
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIt is not what the girl's mother wants it's what is best for the child.
Normally it is best for the child to live with a relation rather than foster carers.
It's also cheaper and easier for the council plus other services like NHS for children to be placed with relations or even close family friends, if the child is older.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Newsnight are currently interviewing the journalist plus various random people.
The family there was a problem with was the first Muslim family NOT the second one she was placed with.
The placements with both families were only intended to be for 6 months.
However the child spent 4 months with the first family who caused the complaint, and two months with the second Muslim family there were absolutely no complaints about.
The person who raised the complaints was not the mother or any relation but someone else in Tower Hamlets who works in Social care. However this professionals' views are being disputed as all foster carers must speak English.
In addition the hearing to place the child with the grandmother has nothing to do with the journalist's story.
I should add I have a bias. The terrible foster carers I've been informed about want and only provide foster homes to older children as younger children require too much care and interaction, there as older ones can be ignored especially if they have a history of poor behaviour. The repercussions of this are obvious."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostOf course it is. But this case gives the appearance of placing the child without consideration of the child's welfare at all, but for some other yet to be disclosed reason. Nice that Tower Hamlets applied for (and were refused) and injunction preventing publication. Not just a corrupt, incompetent council, but cowardly as well (Eyes passim).
'No concerns' with mixed faith foster case - BBC News
The judge, Khatun Sapnara, also disclosed in an order that the girl came from a family with a Muslim background, but were non-practising.
She added that the new arrangements were nothing to do with reports of the foster child in the press."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostSo not quite the "Christian girl placed with Muslim family" originally reported.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostHer parents consider themselves Christian and she has been christened.
As you rightly say average white bread English Christian.Comment
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostA few more details starting to emerge.
'No concerns' with mixed faith foster case - BBC News
So not quite the "Christian girl placed with Muslim family" originally reported.
Read into that what you will.Comment
-
https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-cont...s-20170830.pdf
The actual court order.
Key points -
The child's maternal grandmother is a non practicising muslim
The child's mother says she is of Christian Heritage
The child's father is AWOL
The change of carer to the child's grandmother was not because of any problem with the current placement
The grandmother will be taking the child back to her country of origin
The grandmother required the documents to be interpreted.
The only conclusion I can draw, is that the reporting of the case was extremely biased.Comment
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View Posthttps://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-cont...s-20170830.pdf
The grandmother will be taking the child back to her country of origin
The grandmother required the documents to be interpreted.
The only conclusion I can draw, is that the reporting of the case was extremely biased.
Originally posted by original PM View PostRead into that what you will.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostSapnara is a practising Muslim.
Read into that what you will.
Some judges are practising Christians and knowing the sh*t some Christians believe are we to be afraid of their judgements as well?"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Today 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Comment