Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Most Brits only want to speak English. So they can't take advantage of freedom of movement realistically.
Are you saying it's the EU's fault that "Most Brits" are lazy and poorly educated?
Freedom of movement has allowed many IT contractors to work in various European countries over the years. Speaking languages is useful. Making the effort is the bit that doesn't appeal to "Most Brits", I guess.
Most Brits only want to speak English. So they can't take advantage of freedom of movement realistically. Unless you want to be isolated in some pretty German enclave to make a few quid .. Unable to communicate. Learning a new language as a busy 35 year old is very hard.
It says a lot about the education standards of the country and those that would vote for Brexit that you are right.
But in reality with the world learning English, Brits have it easier than anybody else.
the people of Europe have no chance today, tomorrow, or, into the future, without coming together, uniting, under one voice for foreign policy, army, trade, etc etc etc
as long as the European countries are not under one voice, they are weak compared to the other major powers, and the European countries alone cannot challenge the major world powers
hence, gentlemen, if you don't allow Europe to do the needful and become what it needs to be, for sure your children will
the longer you delay the required inevitable future situation, the harder you make it for the next generations
Leaving the single market means diddly-squat to large portion of the UK population. Even the Government ministers admit they have no clue what the impact might be.
Doesn't have the same ring as:
If you really believe the vote in the referendum was an informed decision, you are clearly deluded. It played on the people's emotions, which the brexit campaign managed to manipulate better.
it has an HQ and control of the subsidiary armies.
Quacks like a Duck
From your link:
A meaningful EU army would involve a Slovak general ordering German men and women into harm’s way and nobody wants that,” he told the Guardian. “We don’t want that and neither do any of the other 27 member states.” He would like to see more defence cooperation – pooling assets and joint operations – although “today it is very difficult to find a pulse in European defence policy
You're implying a Slovak general could order German troops into some war zone.
This is as fake as the Daily express quote of the Swedish minister the other day.
Last edited by BlasterBates; 11 April 2017, 14:45.
You're implying a Slovak general could order German troops into some war zone.
This is as fake as the Daily express quote of the Swedish minister the other day.
have a look at the date on the Guardian article. That would be the denial.
If as per the admission in the Independent they have a central HQ controlling the movements of an EU army one assumes there will be one group of leaders and a Slovak EU General would decide where the German troops could go. Though we know its likely to be a German EU General.
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
have a look at the date on the Guardian article. That would be the denial.
If as per the admission in the Independent they have a central HQ controlling the movements of an EU army one assumes there will be one group of leaders and a Slovak EU General would decide where the German troops could go. Though we know its likely to be a German EU General.
Can you post a link to an article that says this ?
Comment