Originally posted by barrydidit
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The official Budget 2017 DOOM thread
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Right. Definitely agree with that....Originally posted by eek View PostThat was a comment about the budget as a whole not the dividend bit....Comment
-
You don't WANT employment rights.Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostYou can level the playing field but if one side has all their kit provided for free whilst the other team's players have to pay for the kit themselves, how is that fair?
Fair taxes for fair employment rights.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Why should this difference be reflected in the tax system, rather than in the rate?Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostYou can level the playing field but if one side has all their kit provided for free whilst the other team's players have to pay for the kit themselves, how is that fair?Comment
-
If as he says there is a fundamental shift towards self-employment then I guess some big shake-up is needed at some point. But I'd have thought those who have been self-employed for decades as tradesmen are a bigger target, than modern trends towards web-designers and so on.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
We didn't when there was a fair advantage in NOT being employed, but now we're being taxed MORE than the employed, something's gotta give...Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou don't WANT employment rights.His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
It isn't so much about whether it should or should not, it's that it was never codified. In examining this formally, they've decided that there shouldn't be a major tax advantage of flexible working, which is fine, but they need to implement it in a sensible way, and they show no indication of doing this.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostWhy should this difference be reflected in the tax system, rather than in the rate?Comment
-
I agree with the sentiment, people seem to forget the bottom line cost difference between hiring a permie and a contractor isn't that much, companies should expect to pay extra rather than it being reflected in tax savings to the contractor.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostWhy should this difference be reflected in the tax system, rather than in the rate?Comment
-
No we're not, you're just making stuff up. If you want employment rights, go permie and make more money if you think that's how it works now.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Can't stand Hammond, he looks like a (failed!) maths teacher who would struggle to control a class full of 11 year olds.
qhHe had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.
I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment