• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

oh dear: Not meaning to means you are not guilty

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    oh dear: Not meaning to means you are not guilty

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/6150198.stm

    So he said he didnt mean to fire the gun. Tough tulip. You go out with a gun and you use it even though you didnt mean to makes you guilty as sin in my eyes.

    If you didnt mean to use it why did you carry it with you. If a police marksmen had shot this guy he wouldnt have been allowed back on duty by saying he didnt mean to shoot him.

    He should be shot if you ask me.

    #2
    "Muzzaker Imtiaz Shah, 25, was cleared of attempting to murder Pc Teresa Milburn, Mrs Beshenivsky's colleague."

    Sounds plausible to me - does not mean he is not guilty of murder in the first place, but he probably legged it after making shooting one PC.

    Comment


      #3
      "Asked if he remembered a second discharge of the gun, Jamma said: "I recall nothing at all from that point on. I carried on running away."

      Asked if he recalled a third discharge of the gun, Jamma said: "No, not at all."
      "

      Why ask if he heard a 3rd discharge if he had already said he hadn't heard a second? Are these lawyers immigrants?
      Illegitimus non carborundum est!

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Flubster
        Why ask if he heard a 3rd discharge if he had already said he hadn't heard a second?
        Attempting to catch him lieing to destroy his character: standard approach.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by AtW
          Attempting to catch him lieing to destroy his character: standard approach.
          He's admitted to armed robbery and was holding a loaded gun. How much further can his character be destroyed. He's scum. Lock him up and get him outta here.
          Illegitimus non carborundum est!

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Flubster
            He's admitted to armed robbery and was holding a loaded gun.
            He can get longer sentence if it is proven he tried to kill both, that's why lawyers tried to trap him into saying stuff that would confirm that theory, but they failed.

            Either way he will get locked up, but it could have been indefinite without chance for parole if he was convicted of multiple murders.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Sockpuppet
              http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/6150198.stm

              So he said he didnt mean to fire the gun. Tough tulip. You go out with a gun and you use it even though you didnt mean to makes you guilty as sin in my eyes.

              If you didnt mean to use it why did you carry it with you. If a police marksmen had shot this guy he wouldnt have been allowed back on duty by saying he didnt mean to shoot him.

              He should be shot if you ask me.
              WTF did he think a loaded gun was for it not to kill someone.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by zathras
                WTF did he think a loaded gun was for it not to kill someone.
                Aparently he didn't know he was holding a real loaded gun.....

                can't they just do him for lying in court, or being the thickest moron in the world failing that ?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Ardesco
                  Aparently he didn't know he was holding a real loaded gun.....

                  can't they just do him for lying in court, or being the thickest moron in the world failing that ?
                  Listen Ardesco,

                  Old fossils like us must be reeductated so that we can understand and break down the cultural differences that exist between us (poor benighted souls that we are) and our enlightened multicultural (and most especially Muslim) bretheren.

                  They can threaten us with murder and torture. They can slander us and our culture. They can act and dress like fecking aliens from another planet who seek only to invade and impose - and they get away with all of it ffs!

                  The future belongs to them, unless we stand up.

                  You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by AtW
                    He can get longer sentence if it is proven he tried to kill both, that's why lawyers tried to trap him into saying stuff that would confirm that theory, but they failed.

                    Either way he will get locked up, but it could have been indefinite without chance for parole if he was convicted of multiple murders.
                    He's admitted killing a police officer, he won't be coming out except in a wooden box (hopefully)
                    His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X