Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Anyway I think we are all agreed that DA was banned without reason and NAT is on the blob and has power issues. I wouldn't be surprised if NAT beats up small furry animals.
Banned for posting that there's a problem with immigration in Germany? Well, I guess Merkel will see if others agree with him soon enough.
Not why he was banned, afaik, but part of the problem was that he was demanding action be taken, and that such action should comprise of detaining and properly vetting (including criminal record checks) immigrants before they were resettled.
The article he originally posted to start the thread stated that Police had confirmed the individual involved had no previous convictions, and that he had arrived as an unaccompanied minor. As such he must have been through the immigration process, detention and vetting, since he would not have legally been able to claim asylum for himself in the first place.
I simply challenged DA to say what he expected to have been done, since he everything he had said should be done, had been, and was in the article he posted as an example of how the EU was failing to do what it should, in his opinion, be doing.
For the record, I didn't complain about any of his posts. I heartily disagree with what he says, but he has a right to say it.
If the Mods feel he crossed a line then so be it. I'm not about to criticise them for doing a job no-one else really wants, for which they don't get paid and for which they routinely get abused.
"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.
Not why he was banned, afaik, but part of the problem was that he was demanding action be taken, and that such action should comprise of detaining and properly vetting (including criminal record checks) immigrants before they were resettled.
The article he posted stated that Police had confirmed the individual involved had no previous convictions, and that he had arrived as an unaccompanied minor. As such he must have been through the immigration process, detention and vetting, since he would not have legally been able to claim asylum for himself in the first place.
I simply challenged DA to say what he expected to have been done, since he everything he had said should be done, had been, and was in the article he posted as an example of how the EU was failing to do what it should, in his opinion, be doing.
For the record, I didn't complain about any of his posts. I heartily disagree with what he says, but he has a right to say it.
If the Mods feel he crossed a line then so be it. I'm not about to criticise them for doing a job no-one else really wants, for which they don't get paid and for which they routinely get abused.
Bingo
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist
If the Mods feel he crossed a line then so be it. I'm not about to criticise them for doing a job no-one else really wants, for which they don't get paid and for which they routinely get abused.
If the Mods feel he crossed a line then so be it. I'm not about to criticise them for doing a job MF really wants, for which they don't get paid and for which some routinely deserved to be abused.
FTFY
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist
Comment