Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Autumn Statement 2016
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I'm not sure in what way travel (or accommodation) could be considered goods. You're paying for a service.Originally posted by riffpie View PostTravel and subsistence isn't a service.
Subsistence is generally going to be a purchase of goods - usually food and drink costs - but these are explicitly excluded anyway.Comment
-
It's generally crap service, but unless you're keeping the train you travelled on then yes it is.Originally posted by riffpie View PostTravel and subsistence isn't a service.Comment
-
Certainly don't spend that much on stationary - however IT hardware & software, yes. Begs the question whether all IT purchases have to be treated as a capital expense...Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Posthttps://www.gov.uk/government/public...technical-note
Only expenditure on goods counts, and capital expenditure and employee food and drink costs are excluded. IT equipment - yes if its not treated as capital expenditure, stationary yes but how much stationary does the average contract spend their money on? Accountancy is not a purchase of goods.
Very unlikely I spend that much on *goods*. I do spend more than that on other things.
More services.Comment
-
Fair enough. Edited.Originally posted by barrydidit View PostIt's generally crap service, but unless you're keeping the train you travelled on then yes it is.Comment
-
I generally treat hardware over a grand as a capital expense. I used to treat lower cost hardware (phones mainly) as capital expense but I don't anymore. I don't buy hardware that often though.Originally posted by MarkT View PostCertainly don't spend that much on stationary - however IT hardware & software, yes. Begs the question whether all IT purchases have to be treated as a capital expense...
I suppose if you want to be cynical about it, treating hardware purchases as non-capital expenses as a way of avoiding the new FRS rate may welcome unwanted attention from the VAT man though I don't know what criteria they would use for determining if something had been treated as an expense when it should have been capital
Regarding software...if you're buying it and receiving it as a digital download it is treated as a service. Only old-fashioned off-the-shelf software on physical media counts as a good.Comment
-
This is so backwards. Stupid world.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostI generally treat hardware over a grand as a capital expense. I used to treat lower cost hardware (phones mainly) as capital expense but I don't anymore. I don't buy hardware that often though.
I suppose if you want to be cynical about it, treating hardware purchases as non-capital expenses as a way of avoiding the new FRS rate may welcome unwanted attention from the VAT man though I don't know what criteria they would use for determining if something had been treated as an expense when it should have been capital
Regarding software...if you're buying it and receiving it as a digital download it is treated as a service. Only old-fashioned off-the-shelf software on physical media counts as a good.Comment
-
Depends where I'm working.Originally posted by adubya View PostDon't you ?
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
If your accountant provides you with a hard-copy signed copy of your annual accounts, that should count as "goods" surely.Originally posted by riffpie View PostAccounts would be a service, although I'm unsure if they're excluded simply because the word "goods" is used. ...
May sound absurd, but if that is how one must game the system so be it.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment