Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Autumn Statement 2016
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Digs in a shared house - I'm up north in an area that makes County Durham look nice...merely at clientco for the entertainment -
County Durham IS nice. Just not the bits where people live (well the ex-pit villages)Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Wonder if leasing hardware would be better. It's then opex rather than capex.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostI do occasionally buy hardware but not frequently enough to make any difference and capital expenditure is also discounted anyway.Comment
-
Yep I know that. It was the pit villages and towns (bar bits of Darlington, Barnie, Durham and Bish) that I was thinking aboutOriginally posted by d000hg View PostCounty Durham IS nice. Just not the bits where people live (well the ex-pit villages)merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
I don't know - would leasing still be considered a purchase of goods or a purchase of services?Originally posted by riffpie View PostWonder if leasing hardware would be better. It's then opex rather than capex.Comment
-
It isn't a purchase of anything. Leasing equipment is often done so that it's an opex cost rather than a capex one.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostI don't know - would leasing still be considered a purchase of goods or a purchase of services?Comment
-
Agree, leasing is opex.Originally posted by riffpie View PostIt isn't a purchase of anything. Leasing equipment is often done so that it's an opex cost rather than a capex one.Comment
-
I believe you have spectacularly missed the point, lets consider a £600 day rate, certainly not unusual in the cityOriginally posted by d000hg View PostI suppose a reasonable number of people do but I very much doubt it's the norm. And nobody is going to have any sympathy that people earning £100k+ are getting squeezed a bit... it's not like "the rich" who just sneak inside the higher tax threshold and get ire from the lefties, or indeed that you're paying more tax - surely a loophole is just being tightened?
I personally think if you can bring in £10k/month then good on you. But that puts you into the super-tax territory not just FRS issues
.
HMRC will actually collect less of something that is non refundable to the businesses involved, as they are zero VAT rated, that's the funny bit
Example for a day, £600 PD.
At 20% Rate and on FRS
£600 PD
£120 VAT
£720 Invoice Total
14.5% Invoice Total to HMRC = £104.40
At 16.5% and FRS
£600 PD
£99 VAT
£699 Invoice Total
14.5% Invoice Total to HMRC = £101.35The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
but isn't leasing accounted for as a service then rather than goods, so still wouldn't count for the new FRS rulesComment
-
I mean in VAT terms. Is it a good or a service? I would have thought it was a service, even if what you were leasing was a good, but I don't know, what's why I'm asking.Originally posted by riffpie View PostIt isn't a purchase of anything. Leasing equipment is often done so that it's an opex cost rather than a capex one.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment