• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Autumn Statement 2016

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by lucycontractorumbrella View Post
    They have simply raised the Lower Limit for Employers NI to £157 from £156 which puts it in line with Employees NI thresholds, what they cease to shout about is that they have altered the upper earnings threshold from £827 to £866. In a nutshell, contractors are likely to be paying more of their contract rate at 12% for Employers NI and less at the 2% for the top end. Nicely kept quiet!
    So we pay div taxes , pay more ni, pay more taxes and get less from FRS.

    What did we do to p*ss this Gov off so much?!

    I await the calculators postdoc 5th to tell me just how much worse offer all are.....gulp

    Comment


      And that's without us knowing the minute detail of what they referred to as addressing "the cost of incorporation!" Anyone fancy a guess as to what they are hinting at?

      Comment


        Is that why that reporter from The Times is reaching out ??

        Comment


          Originally posted by lucycontractorumbrella View Post
          And that's without us knowing the minute detail of what they referred to as addressing "the cost of incorporation!" Anyone fancy a guess as to what they are hinting at?
          The optimistic side of me would like to think they are referring to things like the dodgy scam certain agencies are running by setting their temps up as two man companies to claim the employers allowance.

          Comment


            I am confused about the abolishing of mobile phone salary sacrifice thing... does this mean that personal use of a company mobile phone is now taxable?
            This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

            Comment


              Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View Post
              I am confused about the abolishing of mobile phone salary sacrifice thing... does this mean that personal use of a company mobile phone is now taxable?
              Do you sacrifice salary to get a mobile or is it a business expense?
              'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

              Comment


                Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                Do you sacrifice salary to get a mobile or is it a business expense?
                Phone is on business tariff paid for by company so business expense, but I understand current rules allow personal usage without re-imbursement by myself personally and without any personal tax liability. TBH I didn't know there was a phone salary sacrifice scheme so no idea if that was different or not?
                This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

                Comment


                  Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View Post
                  Phone is on business tariff paid for by company so business expense, but I understand current rules allow personal usage without re-imbursement by myself personally and without any personal tax liability. TBH I didn't know there was a phone salary sacrifice scheme so no idea if that was different or not?
                  What did your accountant say?
                  'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View Post
                    I am confused about the abolishing of mobile phone salary sacrifice thing... does this mean that personal use of a company mobile phone is now taxable?
                    Only if you take a salary sacrifice to pay for it.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
                      Correct. 16.5% x 1.2 (regular VAT multiple) = 19.8%. Thus, the saving is 20%-19.8%=.2%.

                      But as CP has pointed out, accountancy fees alone would wipe that out. In short, there is no longer a cost saving (indeed, there is likely to be a net cost), but you could argue that the FRS wasn't intended for this, only to simplify accounting.
                      I don't have a problem with not making money from VAT, looks likely we'll all just ditch FRS then?

                      Originally posted by youngguy View Post
                      So we pay div taxes , pay more ni, pay more taxes and get less from FRS.

                      What did we do to p*ss this Gov off so much?!
                      We paid a lot less tax than most people earning similar amounts. So that's an easy way for HMRC to get some more money knowing we can't really kick up too much of a fuss lest we get headlines "£100k contractors complain about having to pay tax like everyone else"

                      Our income being taxed in a way broadly inline with permies earning similar amounts is reasonable IMO, I don't want to pay the extra of course. The fear seems to be they might continue to ramp up our taxes (divi tax, etc) so we're relatively worse off than permies e.g. IR35, expenses claims, etc.
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                      Originally posted by vetran
                      Urine is quite nourishing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X