Narrow minded bigots

[darmstadt]

What is the difference between asexual and not sexual?

Something like 'go **** yourself' and "let me think about it and I'll get back to you." Personally I was more worried about the fact that someone used the word 'sheeps' for the plural of 'sheep'!

[SlipTheJab]

Why hasn't the security guard been slapped after all he's the one who threw them out, mind you security guards are not known for their left leaning liberal views...

[vetran]

How many species removed before they consider FLC's characteristics?

almost all of them

[MrMarkyMark]

almost all of them

Does anyone have an idea as to which ones were left

[darmstadt]

Does anyone have an idea as to which ones were left

Just the one, sitting in the corner, dribbling and giggling to itself...

[MrMarkyMark]

Just the one, sitting in the corner, dribbling and giggling to itself...

Oh..................I wasn't expecting something so advanced down the evolutionary line

[barrydidit]

someone used the word 'sheeps' for the plural of 'sheep'!

I let that one ride. Might have been a welsh person after all. I always think about special needs during projects - brail, speaking services, welsh language etc.. I'm dead thoughful, me

[MrMarkyMark]

I let that one ride. Might have been a welsh person after all. I always think about special needs during projects - brail, speaking services, welsh language etc.. I'm dead thoughful, me

A real man of integrity within the contractor community

I usually find that a lot of people on a particular project would qualify as special needs in any case, even if there was no visible sign

[WTFH]

What is the difference between asexual and not sexual?

asexual - having no sense of the concept of sex
not sexual - having no interest in the practice of sex.




(at a guess, and based on discovering that placing a wedding ring on a woman's finger can make her "not sexual")

[NigelJK]

When researchers try and understand human behaviour they look at the nearest mammals to us first and if they are completely different, they then look at other mammals.

So let's get this right then. Some one proposes that one activity is prevalent in the animal kingdom and that justifies a humans actions. To prove it they keep going down the food chain until they find corresponding activity in an animal?

Apart form the fact that any proper scientific research would ever go down that road as their are no identifiable scientific outcomes worth the effort. The only people to benefit from this kind of talk are the lobby groups.