• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Brexit assistance from the middle east

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Lots of people took great delight in the fall of the Tories at the time. Remember Portillo's face?

    Mostly the Tories lost because everyone was sick of them, just like everyone was sick of Labour by 2010.
    ^ This.

    I expect this is what is written on Corbyn's masterplan for 2020.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
      In 1997 there was a choice between a Tory government lead by John Major that had lots of in fighting over Europe and sex scandals that contradicted their back to basics policy, and Tony Blair leading a united Labour party.

      So it's not surprising people voted for the latter.
      What about 2001 and 2005? People obviously liked him otherwise they wouldn't have voted for him!
      Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
        Lots of people took great delight in the fall of the Tories at the time. Remember Portillo's face?

        Mostly the Tories lost because everyone was sick of them, just like everyone was sick of Labour by 2010.
        Well, sick of all politicians - hence the coalition.
        Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
          What about 2001 and 2005? People obviously liked him otherwise they wouldn't have voted for him!
          He had a majority of 179 (?) to start with. You've got to piss a LOT of people off to burn through that amount of political capital. It happened in the end, but it takes time.

          Comment


            #15
            Well, sick of all politicians - hence the coalition.
            And some thought that voting for more ,and more Bureaucracy, was a good idea.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
              What about 2001 and 2005? People obviously liked him otherwise they wouldn't have voted for him!
              Iain Duncan Smith and William Hague.
              Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

              Comment


                #17
                On 2005 Blair got 35.2% of the vote and 355 seats.

                In 2015 Tories got 36.9% of the vote and 331 seats.

                Which is why the Tories want to standardise the size of a constituency.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by GB9 View Post
                  On 2005 Blair got 35.2% of the vote and 355 seats.

                  In 2015 Tories got 36.9% of the vote and 331 seats.

                  Which is why the Tories want to standardise the size of a constituency.
                  as pointed out once he was in he fiddled with the constituency areas so it was almost impossible for the Tories to win , surprised he didn't set fire to Parliament and declare himself Fuhrer.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
                    On 2005 Blair got 35.2% of the vote and 355 seats.

                    In 2015 Tories got 36.9% of the vote and 331 seats.

                    Which is why the Tories want to standardise the size of a constituency.
                    Except they don't.
                    Let's imagine that there are 600 seats in parliament and 60 million people in the country, just to keep the maths simple.

                    That would mean there is one MP per 100,000 people.
                    London would have 85MPs
                    Birmingham 11
                    Leeds 8
                    Sheffield 6
                    Bradford 5
                    Manchester 5
                    Durham 5
                    Liverpool 5

                    Now, how many of those big cities are majority Tory voters?
                    …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                      Except they don't.
                      Let's imagine that there are 600 seats in parliament and 60 million people in the country, just to keep the maths simple.

                      That would mean there is one MP per 100,000 people.
                      London would have 85MPs
                      Birmingham 11
                      Leeds 8
                      Sheffield 6
                      Bradford 5
                      Manchester 5
                      Durham 5
                      Liverpool 5

                      Now, how many of those big cities are majority Tory voters?
                      FactCheck: is the voting system rigged in favour of Labour?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X