Originally posted by mudskipper
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Was: New forum posting rules Now:PC explains JSA
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bee View PostThat stinks.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Comment
-
Nuff said, case closed.Originally posted by WTFH View PostQuick comment from me regarding "untouchables"...
As part of the initiation ceremony (the welts are going down now, Cojak, and I can stop taking the drugs for that rash, NAT), I was not advised of anyone being untouchable.
But seriously... if users don't report a post and we don't spot it, how are we supposed to moderate it?The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Comment
-
How do you know if they are untouchable? Do you know how many warnings they received?Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostTo be honest, I agree with you.
Good Old untouchable boys:
MarillionFan
Old Greg
sasguru
Suity
Mordac
Vetran
Stek
Ban them all I say
Don't be a child.Comment
-
Ok mum.Originally posted by Bee View PostHow do you know if they are untouchable? Do you know how many warnings they received?
Don't be a child.
Comment
-
Ah if I'd been removed then this would have been a fair point.Originally posted by LondonManc View Post12 pages to try and figure out which mod was childish and establish that PC has a thing for trolling about JSA?
Couldn't one of the mods have simply PM'd PC to tell him that they've removed his signature?
I wish I'd taken a screen shot and I've forgotten exactly what it said but basically it was calling me a benefit scrounging scumbag.
Not appropriate behaviour. Its like changing your mates background image in windows to display a huge cock.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
A little bit of me wants PC to come back on this thread. Even though his posts only consisted of 'This message is hidden because psychocandy is on your ignore list.' they at least made sense and were infinitely more interesting than Bee'sOriginally posted by Bee View PostHow do you know if they are untouchable? Do you know how many warnings they received?
Don't be a child.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment