EU Referendum: Do we enough information to take the correct decision?

[AtW]

We are not worthy to be a part of the great European hegemony.

You'll learn

[NotAllThere]

It also would allow us to decide who is and isn't an asylum seeker, who is an economic migrant and who is a possible threat to our health and wellbeing (health "tourist" and or terrorist).

At the moment, we have zero control over these aspects of migration.

Yes we do.

If someone arrives in the UK seeking asylum, it will be UK immigration who decide whether to grant it. Even if someone is granted asylum in Germany, that doesn't given them any right to travel to or work in any other European country.

It is correct to say that we cannot exclude any EU citizen who chooses to come to the UK to use the NHS. OTOH, we have the same rights to go to any EU country and use their health service. Where people are illegally using the NHS, that's simply a matter of changing UK law and being inside or outside the EU won't affect that.

It is correct to say that we cannot exclude any EU citizen who might be a terrorist threat. But we can arrest them and subject them to existing UK legislation which is used against our home grown terrorist threat.

There are arguments for leaving that are valid. The one's you've put forward are just silly.

[AtW]

The one's you've put forward are just silly.

Psst, he is working hard on the inside to discredit the Leave campaign...

[SueEllen]

There are arguments for leaving that are valid. The one's you've put forward are just silly.

That's not fair.

Clearly not everyone has heard of NATO....

[tomtomagain]

VOTE STAY!

very pretty but it looks like they are serving lager. Urgh.

[AtW]

very pretty but it looks like they are serving lager. Urgh.

Big jugs though, no?

[Scruff]

Please provide the summation of your intellectual argument for leaving EU.

I don't feel the need to justify anything. I am that I am. Sovereign, independent.

[AtW]

I don't feel the need to justify anything. I am that I am. Sovereign, independent.

We were talking about intelligence...

[Scruff]

We were talking about intelligence...

Sorry, you were? I'm refuting your statement. My intelligence is not in debate here. A rebuttal, followed by rhetoric makes no argument, not the basis for any. Take care and good night.

[AtW]

Sorry, you were? I'm refuting your statement. My intelligence is not in debate here. A rebuttal, followed by rhetoric makes no argument, not the basis for any. Take care and good night.

Yes we were:

As a "Leaver", your summation of my intelligence has about as much accuracy as a sundial on a cloudy day

I've asked you to present intelligent argument for LEAVE ...