Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I watched it unfolding at the time, last one still up on Christmas Night in my parents' living room. It was undoubtedly one of Nick Harvey's finest hours, and he's had a few
Daft if doing so really would endanger security on all phones as Apple suggest. Ok, it's a serious terrorist case but does tracking down a few accomplices justify putting millions of users at risk of cyber-fraud?
Daft if doing so really would endanger security on all phones as Apple suggest. Ok, it's a serious terrorist case but does tracking down a few accomplices justify putting millions of users at risk of cyber-fraud?
Not to mention that he destroyed his and his wife's personal phones: this was his work phone.
So if he went to the trouble - after the shooting, mind - of destroying those two phones, what's the likelihood there's any important information on the phone he didn't make any attempt to destroy?
Daft if doing so really would endanger security on all phones as Apple suggest. Ok, it's a serious terrorist case but does tracking down a few accomplices justify putting millions of users at risk of cyber-fraud?
We all know the accomplices are:
1. Still going to be using exactly the same phones with the same SIMs in them, and,
2. Are going to still have those phones in their possession.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR
Comment