Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Daft if doing so really would endanger security on all phones as Apple suggest. Ok, it's a serious terrorist case but does tracking down a few accomplices justify putting millions of users at risk of cyber-fraud?
We all know the accomplices are:
1. Still going to be using exactly the same phones with the same SIMs in them, and,
2. Are going to still have those phones in their possession.
Daft if doing so really would endanger security on all phones as Apple suggest. Ok, it's a serious terrorist case but does tracking down a few accomplices justify putting millions of users at risk of cyber-fraud?
Not to mention that he destroyed his and his wife's personal phones: this was his work phone.
So if he went to the trouble - after the shooting, mind - of destroying those two phones, what's the likelihood there's any important information on the phone he didn't make any attempt to destroy?
Daft if doing so really would endanger security on all phones as Apple suggest. Ok, it's a serious terrorist case but does tracking down a few accomplices justify putting millions of users at risk of cyber-fraud?
I watched it unfolding at the time, last one still up on Christmas Night in my parents' living room. It was undoubtedly one of Nick Harvey's finest hours, and he's had a few
Leave a comment: