• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Finally.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    He cannot refute the logic as explained by Patrick Moore so instead he launches an ad hominen attack on you tube
    Moore denies the well-established link between CO2 and temperature:



    Refuted. Moore is a liar. Google his links to BHP and logging companies for the why.
    My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
      One thing is certain, Paris has galvanised the developing nations.
      India has agreed to severely reduce their plans to double the amount of coal use by 2020, Instead, at Paris, they agreed to double the amount of coal use by 2020.
      India has 17% of the world's population, about 2.5% of emissions, per capita around a tenth of US emissions, I cannot put my hand on my heart and condemn them for not wanting to take a bullet while Americans light log fires in their homes for that authentic glow and and turn on the AC to maintain a comfy ambiance.

      Paris was a sea change, the point at which the tide went out and we all got to see who is swimming naked. Tough for deniers I know, but there it is.
      My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
        I did not say that CO2 has no impact on global temperatures. it is incredible that you zealots will stick like limpets not to the facts (they are selectively useful) but to control of a problem that may or may not be real (exploited to control human behaviour). You have failed completely to argue why the geo technical solution will not work and nor are you really able to logically repudiate the comments made by the Greenpeace founder. Instead you resort to sarcasm and sneers.
        I was not sarcastic or sneering and Patrick Moore was not a founder of Greenpeace. Apart from that ...
        My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
          India has 17% of the world's population, about 2.5% of emissions, per capita around a tenth of US emissions, I cannot put my hand on my heart and condemn them for not wanting to take a bullet while Americans light log fires in their homes for that authentic glow and and turn on the AC to maintain a comfy ambiance.

          Paris was a sea change, the point at which the tide went out and we all got to see who is swimming naked. Tough for deniers I know, but there it is.
          ooh er. that's good then, we agree that India should go for coal. and china.
          everyone else I suppose

          so ..errr

          what was all the fuss about
          (\__/)
          (>'.'<)
          ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by pjclarke View Post



            .
            I'm just really glad we aren't in the -8 deg C periods. I wonder how we would cope with most of Europe buried two miles deep in ice.

            It also shows the so called "man made" aspect is tiny, and we've seen these peaks naturally in the past.

            Also, why does it look like sometimes the temperature change is leading the CO2 change?

            Comment


              #76
              From the above graph we conclude that the ice ages are caused by cyclical changes in CO2 concentration.

              But who was driving the SUV'S at the time.
              I'm alright Jack

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                From the above graph we conclude that the ice ages are caused by cyclical changes in CO2 concentration.

                But who was driving the SUV'S at the time.
                I conclude the scary thing, is that after the nice warm period we are in now, the temperature plummets to an ice age, that will destroy modern civilisation. So thank god for all the V8 driving boys and girls, we salute you!



                PS, when you see the big picture, you realise the graph showing the last 50 years is a joke, with a ridiculous scale that proves nothing.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
                  Moore denies the well-established link between CO2 and temperature:



                  Refuted. Moore is a liar. Google his links to BHP and logging companies for the why.
                  So the figures he quotes in the video are not true? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkdb...ature=youtu.be

                  So we are faced in deciding which to believe. Patrick Moore in hoc to the big corporates or the scientists and socialists who owe either their living or the meat and bones of their ideology to the existence of climate change?

                  For instance did he lie about the climate changing from 4.6 billion years ago?
                  Last edited by DodgyAgent; 16 December 2015, 10:21.
                  Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Do any of the models work if you run them backwards? Because they aren't working very well forwards.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                      Also, why does it look like sometimes the temperature change is leading the CO2 change?
                      Probably because it seems to.

                      Just for giggles:



                      That little red line at the end is our "dangerous" bit.
                      I'm a smug bastard.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X