Finally.

[DodgyAgent]

The bits where his lips were moving.

• The Roman and Mediaeval Warm Periods were warmer than today.
• CO2 and temperatures do not show a strong correlation
• Temperatures over the last 2 decades have been essentially flat.
• I am a Co-Founder of Greenpeace.

What about the bit about the climate constantly changing (something you have never admitted in your attempt to micro control the entire debate)

[darmstadt]

What you'll see is just a few more wind farms, one or two solar cells, and a couple more electric cars....and that's it.

Especially in Scotland: Alex Salmond brands Trump 'loser' after judges reject windfarm appeal | Environment | The Guardian but that might be just to piss off the weirdo

[pjclarke]

That's true.

https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and...n/faq-6-2.html

[BlasterBates]

German Energiewende – Modern Miracle or Major Misstep | Climate Etc.

Germany is burning almost exactly as much coal today as it was 10 years ago. A number of new coal-fired plants have actually come on stream in the last 5 years. The addition of natural gas fired plants means that Germany is now generating more electricity from burning hydro-carbons than it was 25 years ago.

I cannot see how Germany can continue to develop significantly more wind and solar resources in the next few years. The imbalances between supply and demand at different times of the day and different months of the year are becoming too extreme. And with so much generating capacity in place it is difficult to imagine utilities building any new plants. What that means when the nuclear plants shut down is anyone’s guess but it does not look like a pretty picture to me.

[SueEllen]

Especially in Scotland: Alex Salmond brands Trump 'loser' after judges reject windfarm appeal | Environment | The Guardian but that might be just to piss off the weirdo

Let's hope Trump annoys the Irish next.

[SpontaneousOrder]

so we know that we have increased the abundance of various greenhouse gases and we know, from calculations and observations, that this has placed the planet in a radiative imbalance, the amplitude of which we know to within +/- 10%.

No... we don't! This is the evidence I'm asking for. All you have are models.

If you know a better means of forecasting the future, without using some kind of model, I for one, would love to hear about it. Tea-leaves?

Straw man much?

[pjclarke]

No... we don't! This is the evidence I'm asking for. All you have are models.

Right, its turtles all the way down. Nope, not playing that game.

http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailin...lancePaper.pdf

[EternalOptimist]

Right, its turtles all the way down. Nope, not playing that game.

I think the cheese has finally slipped off his cracker

[SpontaneousOrder]

Right, its turtles all the way down. Nope, not playing that game.

http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailin...lancePaper.pdf

Turtles, lol. All I've been asking is for the first turtle.

[pjclarke]

Turtles, lol. All I've been asking is for the first turtle.

Disingenuous. A 10 year old with a laptop could in ten minutes locate the enough evidence for AGW to keep you reading for a month. IMO you are more interested in playing juvenile games than you are in an honest discussion of the evidence. I'm not playing.