Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
If you look at the welfare costs in the US, and how they are weighted with regards to immigrants & non-immigrants (not sure right now how many generations is significant), then you can clearly see it's not really honest to compare new immigrants with the whole of the non-native population.
Maybe not - although perhaps going back generations it was always the case that the "new" immigrants could be viewed the same way and yet ended up being integrated and vital to the nation.
The wider point is that the US is founded on the basis of immigration and has always done quite well as a melting pot of cultures and nationalities. This is one of the things which has led to its success.
Perhaps he is just saying that US immigration policy needs to be more selective in light of recent events -allbeit in inflammatory language
Recent events: over 10,000 people per year are killed in homicides in the US. Of the 10,000 this year...
9,986 were "Lone madman, bad person, can't legislate against them having guns..."
14 were "terrorist because they are Muslim therefore ban all Muslims"
Comment