Originally posted by VectraMan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Should the Lords prayer be banned?
Collapse
X
-
You would only have to replace it with something. As the Church did with Saturnalia.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation! -
Baby is born without a father to a virgin mother, has special powers, tempted by evil and brough back from the dead.
The other story is about Jesus and is clearly unsuitable for the audience of the former.Comment
-
-
In the same way they discriminate against porno vendors advertising. Or manufacturers of fizzy pop who don't want to pay as much as coca-cola.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI disagree as they have discriminated against religious groups in general. There are far worse adverts around.
Discrimination keeps us all alive.Comment
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostIf you decide to open a business that only deals with white males then so be it - just do not expect it to do well.
Holy tulip.
Someone who can see the blindingly obvious fact that in a nation of decent people (which presumably democracy advocates think we are) don't need to wave guns in peoples faces to signal inappropriate behaviour.
The market (for both trade & social standing) is plenty enough, as bad behaviour is bad for business!
And all that without having to compromise your principles by getting all violent with people for having a different opinion than you.
Perhaps everyone can sell their votes for something more urgent than siccing the dogs on people who hurt your feelings.Comment
-
Archbishop: We find this decision bewildering.
Vicars: We are mildly chagrined by this.
Cameron: it should be shown.
Daily Mail: THIS IS THE END OF LIFE ON EARTH AS WE KNOW IT
Dawkins: the advert should be shown
Every MP: show this advert now
The Devil: Even I want this shown now.
Secular society: We sort of don't want it shown
All of Twitter: it should be shown
Every newspaper columnist: show it! show it! show it!
God: Settle down.Comment
-
I haven't seen anybody on Twitter saying it should be shown.Originally posted by unixman View PostArchbishop: We find this decision bewildering.
Vicars: We are mildly chagrined by this.
Cameron: it should be shown.
Daily Mail: THIS IS THE END OF LIFE ON EARTH AS WE KNOW IT
Dawkins: the advert should be shown
Every MP: show this advert now
The Devil: Even I want this shown now.
Secular society: We sort of don't want it shown
All of Twitter: it should be shown
Every newspaper columnist: show it! show it! show it!
God: Settle down.
Though that just demonstrates that any claim that "Twitter says…" means nothing, as every possible shade of opinion (and quite a few one would have thought were impossible) can be found on there.
It's a godsend to lazy journalists, who can find whatever stripe of opinion they want to claim exists with a simple search, but it also means that claims that "All of Twitter" says something are inevitably false.Comment
-
All lazy journalists need to do is post some trash. Then print the readers letters. Sorted....Originally posted by NickFitz View PostI haven't seen anybody on Twitter saying it should be shown.
Though that just demonstrates that any claim that "Twitter says…" means nothing, as every possible shade of opinion (and quite a few one would have thought were impossible) can be found on there.
It's a godsend to lazy journalists, who can find whatever stripe of opinion they want to claim to have found with a simple search, but it also means that claims that "All of Twitter" says something are inevitably false.Comment
-
When I said Twitter, I actually meant well known commentators, TV and radio journalists and so on.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostI haven't seen anybody on Twitter saying it should be shown.
I have rarely seen the MSM in such wide agreement over an issue. Literally and I mean literally every columnist in every news paper is saying show it, and in no uncertain terms. Only dissenters are the Secular society.Comment
-
As far as Twitter is concerned, everybody I follow who's either mentioned it or retweeted somebody who has is clearly of the opinion that it should not be shown. Seriously, 100% against - including journalistsOriginally posted by unixman View PostWhen I said Twitter, I actually meant well known commentators, TV and radio journalists and so on.
I have rarely seen the MSM in such wide agreement over an issue. Literally and I mean literally every columnist in every news paper is saying show it, and in no uncertain terms. Only dissenters are the Secular society.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment