• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

UK energy future

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Given the scale of new coal fired stations being built in China and Japan this idiotic UK policy will do nothing for global CO2 emissions whatever.

    As U.S. Shutters Coal Plants, China and Japan are Building Them - IER
    That's a rather skewed analysis from an industry-funded thinktank. China is indeed opening new coal plant, while at the same time closing smaller, older, dirtier stations.

    “Coal demand is slowing” in China while all other fuels, including oil, gas and renewables, are being consumed more, said Sophie Lu, a Beijing-based analyst at BNEF. The IEA has identified shifting energy consumption in China, the most populous nation with 1.4 billion people, as among the reasons global carbon dioxide emissions was flat last year.

    Fatih Birol, the IEA’s chief economist who was*named*in February as the agency’s next executive director, said the results are an encouraging sign.
    “This gives me even more hope that humankind will be able to work together to combat climate change, the most important threat facing us today,” Birol said in the IEA statement
    China Carbon Emissions Decline as 2014 Global CO2 Stays Flat - Bloomberg Business


    That said, the UK decision is welcome, but pretty neglible in the global scheme of things. China however, in its submission to the upcoming Paris conference has pledged to work to ensure its emissions peak in 2030 then go into decline. Current signs are it will achieve the goal early, in 2025.



    Chinese CO2 Emissions Headed To 2025 Peak, May Plateau Much Sooner | ThinkProgress
    My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
      What are they doing to destroy these industries exactly?
      Maliciously not pouring oodles of borrowed money into propping up non-viable businesses.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #23
        FTFY

        It got sold, lock stock and barrel, to Bob Shawadiwadi
        The Chunt of Chunts.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
          What are they doing to destroy these industries exactly?
          It's a sort of unintended consequence of having high energy prices and other green taxes.
          It's probably not the biggest factor, but it doesn't help
          (\__/)
          (>'.'<)
          ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
            What are they doing to destroy these industries exactly?
            Not investing in them. FWIR e.g. Redcar was one of the most efficient smelting plants in Europe, it needed to be kept supplied with coke otheriwise basically the huge freestanding ovens collapse, and it costs many millions or billions of pounds to rebuild them. Bearing in mind Steel is a cyclical industry, the prices go up and down. The government had two choices:

            1) Keep the plant in it's mothballed state, limited production, whilst the global steel price is artificially low. Keep people in work, maintain a strategic industry.
            2) Let it self destruct, everyone loses their jobs, decimates the area, plant can never be brought back on-line, loss of a strategic industry, reliance on foreign steel, cost of cleaning up the site for re-use is many billions.

            Govt. went for option (2). s
            Originally posted by Nigel Farage MEP - 2016-06-24 04:00:00
            "I hope this victory brings down this failed project and leads us to a Europe of sovereign nation states, trading together, being friends together, cooperating together, and let's get rid of the flag, the anthem, Brussels, and all that has gone wrong."

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
              Not investing in them. FWIR e.g. Redcar was one of the most efficient smelting plants in Europe, it needed to be kept supplied with coke otheriwise basically the huge freestanding ovens collapse, and it costs many millions or billions of pounds to rebuild them. Bearing in mind Steel is a cyclical industry, the prices go up and down. The government had two choices:

              1) Keep the plant in it's mothballed state, limited production, whilst the global steel price is artificially low. Keep people in work, maintain a strategic industry.
              2) Let it self destruct, everyone loses their jobs, decimates the area, plant can never be brought back on-line, loss of a strategic industry, reliance on foreign steel, cost of cleaning up the site for re-use is many billions.

              Govt. went for option (2). s
              It was owned by SSI wasn't it? What's it got to do with the government?
              Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                Maliciously not pouring oodles of borrowed money into propping up non-viable businesses.
                .. except they're not businesses really are they, they're utilities that have been privatised and thus run for quarter-to-quarter profits rather than to keep a country functioning for any length of time.

                I think you'll find it will cost the government a lot more money to clean up/replace these closed industries, than the private companies save by closing them.
                Originally posted by Nigel Farage MEP - 2016-06-24 04:00:00
                "I hope this victory brings down this failed project and leads us to a Europe of sovereign nation states, trading together, being friends together, cooperating together, and let's get rid of the flag, the anthem, Brussels, and all that has gone wrong."

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
                  .. except they're not businesses really are they, they're utilities that have been privatised and thus run for quarter-to-quarter profits rather than to keep a country functioning for any length of time.

                  I think you'll find it will cost the government a lot more money to clean up/replace these closed industries, than the private companies save by closing them.
                  They are known as strategic assets. i.e. in time of war they are necessary for survival and the war effort is maximised if they are publicly owned, in time of peace they are privately owned and run for the benefit of the shareholders
                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                    They are known as strategic assets. i.e. in time of war they are necessary for survival and the war effort is maximised if they are publicly owned, in time of peace they are privately owned and run for the benefit of the shareholders
                    So if a CW2 or anything kicks off, do we just then hold our hands up and say "Can we just pause for 8-12 years whilst we get a few smelting plants up and running? Oh and can we buy some steel off you to build these.. ah.. .. cancel that.."

                    Originally posted by VectraMan
                    It was owned by SSI wasn't it? What's it got to do with the government?
                    They had the ability to keep it running, it was still a national asset, but chose not to citing some European directive about State Aid. Now SSI has washed their hands of it, the clean-up job and paying benefits for the ex-skilled workers is everything to do with the government.
                    Originally posted by Nigel Farage MEP - 2016-06-24 04:00:00
                    "I hope this victory brings down this failed project and leads us to a Europe of sovereign nation states, trading together, being friends together, cooperating together, and let's get rid of the flag, the anthem, Brussels, and all that has gone wrong."

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
                      So if a CW2 or anything kicks off, do we just then hold our hands up and say "Can we just pause for 8-12 years whilst we get a few smelting plants up and running? Oh and can we buy some steel off you to build these.. ah.. .. cancel that.."

                      now you are getting it. and when you throw in the fact that we don't have the shipping either, to get stuff in
                      It's time to get two sets of 'Fly fishing by JR Hartley'
                      put one jacket on the Communist manifesto
                      the other on the Koran

                      then hide them in the bookshelf until you see who is winning
                      (\__/)
                      (>'.'<)
                      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X