• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Consensual sex while drunk

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Erm yes but in this case the women was let off...
    No. Being let off implies she was guilty. She was found not guilty which means she didn't assault him. The jury on examining the evidence, decided that the beating was consensual.

    Originally posted by NibblyPig View Post
    What part of the article isn't assault/rape? He passed out and came to with her beating the crap out of him?
    That was his story, and the jury didn't believe it.
    Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
      No. Being let off implies she was guilty. She was found not guilty which means she didn't assault him. The jury on examining the evidence, decided that the beating was consensual.

      That was his story, and the jury didn't believe it.
      This.

      It does sound dodgy, and it's hard to imagine wanting to be beaten (or do the beating) to the point of requiring hospital treatment for sexual kicks, but it does indeed takes all sorts.

      Pretty sure there was a similar one recently where the genders were reversed, and he was also found not guilty. Off to google...

      Comment


        #13
        Why try to upset a perfectly good trip on the outrage bus? Spoilsports!

        Comment


          #14
          Here we go

          http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...oman-then.html

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
            In that case the woman got anonymity. Why did the man not get anonymity in this case?

            Personally I think all this talk of sexism is nonsense. If you get very drunk you will do things you cannot remember. It is no good feeling guilty later - then going to the police.

            A female friend of mine had a mistress. One night the mistress got very drunk. The friend's husband had sex with the mistress. She made all the running and had two thundering orgasms. The following day she was amazed by what she had done. No recollection whatsoever.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by centurian View Post
              If it's a woman who forgets the safe-word, man is guilty. If a man forgets the safe word, woman is not guilty.
              The safe word is RED, always has been, always will be
              (\__/)
              (>'.'<)
              ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

              Comment


                #17
                It completely baffles me why people don't just use the phrase "safe word" as a safe word?
                "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

                https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

                Comment


                  #18
                  During the trial Mr Lock admitted chaining and whipping the woman but said: 'It was supposed to be kinky fun'.

                  The court also heard that Mr Lock had four previous convictions for domestic violence against three former partners.

                  Outside court he said he was 'disgusted' the case had been brought to court, saying: 'I didn't do anything wrong'.
                  And I suggested he had been let off in the original post.
                  Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                    No. Being let off implies she was guilty. She was found not guilty which means she didn't assault him. The jury on examining the evidence, decided that the beating was consensual.

                    That was his story, and the jury didn't believe it.
                    Interesting she was quite clearly guilty of beating him to a point where he had to go to A&E - that is not in question

                    What is in question is whether he wanted her to or not and therefore whether it is assault.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X