• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Should mens' genitals be sliced up?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Effects vs statistical significance

    Hmmm.

    Far more people get bitten by mosquitoes than get run over. I think NF wins that debate.
    No, I think he has a valid point; the practice of male genital mutilation may not be as damaging to the individual in question on a purely physical level (fair bit more than the mosquito bite of your analogy, though) but it is widely accepted in developed countries like the US, whereas FGM is largely considered to be a barbarous practice relegated to less than developed countries and cultures. There really is no moral justification for either practice.
    Last edited by Zero Liability; 11 September 2015, 18:27.

    Comment


      #32
      There really is no moral justification for either practice
      Don't disagree with that. "Moral" is all crap anyway.
      bloggoth

      If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
      John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
        Effects vs statistical significance

        Hmmm.

        Far more people get bitten by mosquitoes than get run over. I think NF wins that debate.
        Which debate are you referring to? The one that suggests that the relatively few victims of backwater savagery at the hands of backwards & primitive mutilators suffer more?

        Or the one that suggests that victims of mutilation at the hands of modern & enlightened cultures are ignored by the mainstream because of their sex?

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
          Which debate are you referring to? The one that suggests that the relatively few victims of backwater savagery at the hands of backwards & primitive mutilators suffer more?

          Or the one that suggests that victims of mutilation at the hands of modern & enlightened cultures are ignored by the mainstream because of their sex?
          Becoming a MenaNazi is probably not the way to win the argument.

          I do agree either operation being performed on people who can't consent are pretty repellent.

          If an adult wants to lose their foreskin or have their lady bits mangled and are willing to pay for it I don't mind.

          Comment


            #35
            Oh, I see ZL said what I was thinking already.

            Although, if 'moral' is all crap, then youre in danger of passing comment on whether this mutilation stuff is 'good' or 'bad'! Be careful.

            Comment


              #36
              I'll take the no option

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                Becoming a MenaNazi is probably not the way to win the argument.

                I do agree either operation being performed on people who can't consent are pretty repellent.

                If an adult wants to lose their foreskin or have their lady bits mangled and are willing to pay for it I don't mind.
                I don't know what a menanazi is, but the context of the conversation is regarding non consenting physical abuse (of a particularly horrendous kind). People go to piercing places or cosmetic surgeons all the time to have bits removed. We're talking about the forcible mutilation of genitals (or anything for that matter) for no practical reason to the benefit of the abused.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
                  I don't know what a menanazi is, but the context of the conversation is regarding non consenting physical abuse (of a particularly horrendous kind). People go to piercing places or cosmetic surgeons all the time to have bits removed. We're talking about the forcible mutilation of genitals (or anything for that matter) for no practical reason to the benefit of the abused.
                  think femanazi. Your post is starting to sound like that. Its not "because I is a bloke".

                  As I say if Adults choose to do it of their own free will then fine, that is entirely their problem so long as they fund all costs themselves or there is a real medical need.

                  However both of these activities tend to be done to children or due to significant pressure from backward cultures, that I strongly disagree with.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
                    Don't disagree with that. "Moral" is all crap anyway.
                    Then substitute it for "decent way to treat someone".

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
                      Then substitute it for "decent way to treat someone".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X