Originally posted by xoggoth
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Should mens' genitals be sliced up?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
No, I think he has a valid point; the practice of male genital mutilation may not be as damaging to the individual in question on a purely physical level (fair bit more than the mosquito bite of your analogy, though) but it is widely accepted in developed countries like the US, whereas FGM is largely considered to be a barbarous practice relegated to less than developed countries and cultures. There really is no moral justification for either practice.Last edited by Zero Liability; 11 September 2015, 18:27. -
Don't disagree with that. "Moral" is all crap anyway.There really is no moral justification for either practicebloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Which debate are you referring to? The one that suggests that the relatively few victims of backwater savagery at the hands of backwards & primitive mutilators suffer more?Originally posted by xoggoth View PostEffects vs statistical significance
Hmmm.
Far more people get bitten by mosquitoes than get run over. I think NF wins that debate.
Or the one that suggests that victims of mutilation at the hands of modern & enlightened cultures are ignored by the mainstream because of their sex?Comment
-
Becoming a MenaNazi is probably not the way to win the argument.Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostWhich debate are you referring to? The one that suggests that the relatively few victims of backwater savagery at the hands of backwards & primitive mutilators suffer more?
Or the one that suggests that victims of mutilation at the hands of modern & enlightened cultures are ignored by the mainstream because of their sex?
I do agree either operation being performed on people who can't consent are pretty repellent.
If an adult wants to lose their foreskin or have their lady bits mangled and are willing to pay for it I don't mind.Comment
-
Oh, I see ZL said what I was thinking already.
Although, if 'moral' is all crap, then youre in danger of passing comment on whether this mutilation stuff is 'good' or 'bad'! Be careful.Comment
-
-
I don't know what a menanazi is, but the context of the conversation is regarding non consenting physical abuse (of a particularly horrendous kind). People go to piercing places or cosmetic surgeons all the time to have bits removed. We're talking about the forcible mutilation of genitals (or anything for that matter) for no practical reason to the benefit of the abused.Originally posted by vetran View PostBecoming a MenaNazi is probably not the way to win the argument.
I do agree either operation being performed on people who can't consent are pretty repellent.
If an adult wants to lose their foreskin or have their lady bits mangled and are willing to pay for it I don't mind.Comment
-
think femanazi. Your post is starting to sound like that. Its not "because I is a bloke".Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostI don't know what a menanazi is, but the context of the conversation is regarding non consenting physical abuse (of a particularly horrendous kind). People go to piercing places or cosmetic surgeons all the time to have bits removed. We're talking about the forcible mutilation of genitals (or anything for that matter) for no practical reason to the benefit of the abused.
As I say if Adults choose to do it of their own free will then fine, that is entirely their problem so long as they fund all costs themselves or there is a real medical need.
However both of these activities tend to be done to children or due to significant pressure from backward cultures, that I strongly disagree with.Comment
-
Then substitute it for "decent way to treat someone".Originally posted by xoggoth View PostDon't disagree with that. "Moral" is all crap anyway.Comment
-
Originally posted by Zero Liability View PostThen substitute it for "decent way to treat someone".Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Outside IR35 isn’t making a comeback in 2026/27 — it’s something more complex Today 04:55
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Yesterday 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Aug 3 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59

Comment