I may have been wrong about Global Warming

[WTFH]

I think anyone who would vaccinate a chemtrail is a gobsh!te.

So, even though some non-scientific people say vaccinations are wrong, do you disagree with them and agree with the scientists on this occasion?

[BlasterBates]

Global warming isn't a debate with scientists on one side and non-scientists on the other.

It's a debate between scientists who believe man is responsible and other scientists that believe it is simply a natural cycle and over the next 20 years there will be global cooling.

[vetran]

Its called climate change now KUATB, you don't get grants for something people can disprove by reading thermometers.

The climate changes and all the bad effects must be due to man so give us another grant. sorted.


however its a small planet and we do seem pretty determined to ruin it.Maybe we should stop?

[EternalOptimist]

So, even though some non-scientific people say vaccinations are wrong, do you disagree with them and agree with the scientists on this occasion?

What on earth are you babbling on about now ?

[pjclarke]

Global warming isn't a debate with scientists on one side and non-scientists on the other.

That's actually an excellent description.

It's a debate between scientists who believe man is responsible and other scientists that believe it is simply a natural cycle and over the next 20 years there will be global cooling.

In what proportions?

[pjclarke]

Its called climate change now KUATB,

The IPCC was formed 27 years ago. Guess what the 'CC' stands for?

[vetran]

The IPCC was formed 27 years ago. Guess what the 'CC' stands for?

complete Cnuts?

[BlasterBates]

It may be true that between 2012 and 2013 no papers appeared from authors that rejected Global Warming, but that would be like saying the theory of relativity doesn't exist because no papers exists that support it were published in 1916, and then show a very over dimensional pie chart.


Popular Technology.net: 1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism

[BrilloPad]

Its called climate change now KUATB, you don't get grants for something people can disprove by reading thermometers.

The climate changes and all the bad effects must be due to man so give us another grant. sorted.


however its a small planet and we do seem pretty determined to ruin it.Maybe we should stop?

Define ruin?

I think there are just too many humans.

[pjclarke]

It may be true that between 2012 and 2013 no papers appeared from authors that rejected Global Warming, but that would be like saying the theory of relativity doesn't exist because no papers exists that support it were published in 1916, and then show a very over dimensional pie chart.

Among the scientific community, the concensus is overwhelming, the '97%' is probably an underestimate. Every professional scientific organisation of standing has issued a position statement agreeing with the IPCC, representing several tens of thousands of climate scientists. On the other hand we have a list on wiki of those who dissent, a motley bunch of around 70, mainly emiritus, retired or deceased and most not actual climate scientists. David Bellamy is the first entry, for example.

'Popular Technology' is actually one bloke and a search engine. Has he got over 1,000 now? Well done. Remove those that are from the comedy journal Energy and Environment, not actually peer-reviewed, out of date, irrelevant, contradictory or not actually supportive of 'scepticism' and you are left with less than 0.1% of the literature, which runs to about 850,000 studies.

Meet The Denominator
900+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming (AGW) Alarm


]