Originally posted by alluvial
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Next Falklands war
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
I doubt you could put two thoughts together, so probably best you stick with a piss poor insult rather than a well thought out repost. -
Good for you, despite your limitations still trying to join in with the conversation. Don't lose heart your next comment might make sense.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostBeing stupid is not understanding that he decision to defend the Falklands was a combination of all those factors.
As for Putin what would happen if he decided to invade Scotland? Given the logic shown here we should feel guilt for our colonial past and let him have the place along with all the whining "victims" of the SNP.Last edited by woohoo; 25 April 2015, 11:28.Comment
-
Unfortunately left wing whiners like you don't understand reasoned argument. All you can do is trot out the same old mantras based on a dogma of apeasment and capitulation with a big splash of atonement.Originally posted by woohoo View PostI doubt you could put two thoughts together, so probably best you stick with a piss poor insult rather than a well thought out repost.
So piss off you quisling.Comment
-
lol left wing whiners. Go and play with your banjo and cheer up, it's Saturday, the day you have sex with your sister.Originally posted by alluvial View PostUnfortunately left wing whiners like you don't understand reasoned argument. All you can do is trot out the same old mantras based on a dogma of apeasment and capitulation with a big splash of atonement.
So piss off you quisling.Comment
-
just love the number of trot use in this thread.Originally posted by alluvial View PostUnfortunately left wing whiners like you don't understand reasoned argument. All you can do is trot out the same old mantras based on a dogma of apeasment and capitulation with a big splash of atonement.
So piss off you quisling.(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Comment
-
I'm pretty sure 'being British' isn't a basic human right.Originally posted by alluvial View PostYou can't argue the wider point without denying people's right to self determination. And it isn't politics, it's basic human rights.
I'm saying that I doubt anyone in power then or now really gives a tulip about those islanders - or human rights (see Diego Garcia). Those islands are more likely viewed as an important strategic and economic outpost, and a pot full of mindless nationalism to be stirred whenever the plebs become restless.Originally posted by alluvial View PostAnd what the feck point were you trying to put with that last paragraph? Try again but think through what it is you are trying to say first.
**edit** and that those things lying under the surface are probably what makes the cost seem more reasonable.Last edited by SpontaneousOrder; 25 April 2015, 19:37.Comment
-
Presumably the hidden agenda is to scale back because our armed forces are going to be subsumed into some EU defence force at some time in the future.Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostTher'll be no new war over the Falklands. Thanks to dave and his chums, the Armed Forces and especially the Royal Navy have been decimated and will not be able to mount a defence never mind re take them.
19 surface warship in active service and most of them are 15 years old or more. The only ship generally on active patrol around the Falklands tends to be a glorified fisheries protection vessel, HMS Clyde (and even that is leased to the friggin' Navy!).
The Army has 82,000 active soldiers, they could all fit inside Wembley Stadium and you'd still have 8,000 spare seats. 7 or 8 squadrons of planes, most of them antiquated Tornados.
Mugs.
Can't see them going to the South Atlantic to stick it to the Argies...
Still, if the Greens had there way, we'd have no army at all...Comment
-
...
Especially the Frenchies with their record of providing Super Etendards, Exocets and technicians during the war. Jeez, they wouldn't know where to land; on our shared AC or back on land with their real friends.Originally posted by Gumbo Robot View PostPresumably the hidden agenda is to scale back because our armed forces are going to be subsumed into some EU defence force at some time in the future.
Can't see them going to the South Atlantic to stick it to the Argies...
Still, if the Greens had there way, we'd have no army at all...Comment
-
It is usually a type 45 defending the islands which were all built in the last few year.Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostTher'll be no new war over the Falklands. Thanks to dave and his chums, the Armed Forces and especially the Royal Navy have been decimated and will not be able to mount a defence never mind re take them.
19 surface warship in active service and most of them are 15 years old or more. The only ship generally on active patrol around the Falklands tends to be a glorified fisheries protection vessel, HMS Clyde (and even that is leased to the friggin' Navy!).
The Army has 82,000 active soldiers, they could all fit inside Wembley Stadium and you'd still have 8,000 spare seats. 7 or 8 squadrons of planes, most of them antiquated Tornados.
Mugs.
One could probably take on the entire Argentine airforce.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment