• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

limit families to three children?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Solves the child benefit issues, solves the pressure on the NHS and schools, solves the housing shortage and solves the immigration issue as we will have more room as less over crowding.
    At the same time, utilise mandatory genetic screening and subsequent abortion of embryos with any genetic disorder.

    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #12
      What if one of the kids is ginger? Will they still count?

      Comment


        #13
        Just give benefits for the first 3 in this modern world there is no need for the state to support large families

        By all means have as many as you want though

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
          You can't make it work in a democracy let alone China, the best you can do is take away financial incentives to have more children
          The financial incentive for not having many children is that having children is expensive. Large families are only of benefit to the feckless who should all be sent for medical experimentation for the benefit of the rest of us.
          Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by DannyF1966 View Post
            What if a couple already have two children, decide to have a third and then end up with twins?
            What if a couple with NO children have twins....

            They receive a different amount for each child. The one born first is "worth" £20.50 and the other one £13.55

            So the concept of each child being "worth" different amounts has been ingrained in the child benefit system for decades.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by centurian View Post
              What if a couple with NO children have twins....

              They receive a different amount for each child. The one born first is "worth" £20.50 and the other one £13.55

              So the concept of each child being "worth" different amounts has been ingrained in the child benefit system for decades.
              And that is something that Tamba has been campaigning about for decades. The official excuse for the difference is that parents will already have bought stuff which can be used. It absolutely falls about if you get twins. I remember the price of a suitable pushchair was and the size of it meant it wouldn't fit in the current car....
              merely at clientco for the entertainment

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                At the same time, utilise mandatory genetic screening and subsequent abortion of embryos with any genetic disorder.

                are you trying to suggest removing the benefit incentive to breed is akin to Eugenics?
                Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by vetran View Post
                  are you trying to suggest removing the benefit incentive to breed is akin to Eugenics?
                  No, I'm saying a legal limit on how many children you may have is. The 3 child limit FOR BENEFITS was the other thread.
                  Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                  I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                  Originally posted by vetran
                  Urine is quite nourishing

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Of course 3 children is the worst number to have. After that you stop caring.

                    Now I just need wife number 3 for that 4th child.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                      Of course 3 children is the worst number to have. After that you stop caring.

                      Now I just need wife number 3 for that 4th child.
                      Wouldn't 5 autistic kids be too many?
                      What happens in General, stays in General.
                      You know what they say about assumptions!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X