• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Front page of times - muslamic paedophiles

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    Ok, let us ask you a question.

    Define a Muslim.
    Now your talking sense- the fact is there is no one definition. This is just a Narrative of islamaphobic demonisation that you, NLUK and others are gullible to. The generalisation helps nobody but extremists and increases the chance of terrorism because the extremists are armed with more and the moderates become weakened.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
      We have singular common factor that has appeared out of all these. Not all are Pakistani, so that's out. What else is there? They were all Muslims, and they were all men.

      Is that a good place to start understanding the problem?

      No one says they are going to act against everyone, just look in to the cultural issues as to why these common factors are an issue.
      Oh yeah that sounds very scientific! I am yet to come across a scientific study which relates the religion to the crime - care to provide one since u are proposing it?

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
        Bollox, that!

        Which religion advises people to rape? Explain that!
        Mohammed captured female slaves in battle and raped them, and instructed his followers to do the same

        If the teachings of religion encourage rape, is that close enough to rape for you ?
        Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

        No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
          Still haven't seen you suggesting a title or approach that doesn't offend anyone.......
          How about 'religious bigots'?
          Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
            How about 'religious bigots'?
            I was thinking more 'Bunch of F***ing scum'

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
              Now your talking sense- the fact is there is no one definition. This is just a Narrative of islamaphobic demonisation that you, NLUK and others are gullible to. The generalisation helps nobody but extremists and increases the chance of terrorism because the extremists are armed with more and the moderates become weakened.
              Human beings need a sense of belonging. They therefore at various levels join groups with who they like to identify and be identified by. groups are split into Nation states, religions, chelsea supporters etc etc. by identifying with a group you take the good with the bad . if you do not like the bad you do something about it or you do not. the fact that these people are muslim means that they are part of such a group and that their group no matter how attached to it they are should be taking responsibility for their members behaviour. So identifying the group makes sense.
              Unfortunately we have in our world patronising self loathing hypocrites like you who only see wrong in your own group and condescendingly refuse to see wrong in others. Apart from this attitude showing contempt towards other groups by acknowledging that they are not civilised enough to take the same responsibility for their members behaviour as those in your groups, it also prevents authorities from finding and punishing the perpetrators.
              Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
                Mohammed captured female slaves in battle and raped them, and instructed his followers to do the same

                If the teachings of religion encourage rape, is that close enough to rape for you ?
                Where did that come from? Never heard that.

                The guys who raped the poor girl in India are all Hindus. I never heard Hinduism preach/encourage rape. How about that for a double take?

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
                  Are they picking up some religious book that tells them to go and be paedophiles?
                  The majority of traditional hadith sources state that Aisha was married to Muhammad at the age of six or seven, but she stayed in her parents' home until the age of nine, or ten according to Ibn Hisham,[11] when the marriage was consummated with Muhammad, then 53, in Medina.[12][13][14]


                  Aisha - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
                    Oh yeah that sounds very scientific! I am yet to come across a scientific study which relates the religion to the crime - care to provide one since u are proposing it?
                    But doesn't a study need to make a statement before it is either proved or disproved? They don't care in studies if the title is correct or not as long as a conclusion is made at the end of the study.

                    There is no way of getting this right. Someone moron is going to be offended what tey say or do. Sometimes you just have to swallow it and hope the outcome justifies the problems. If we can get an answer to this that will keep people safe from whoever then it can't be a bad thing can it. Some people just want if fixing rather than getting hung up on titles.
                    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
                      Now your talking sense- the fact is there is no one definition. This is just a Narrative of islamaphobic demonisation that you, NLUK and others are gullible to. The generalisation helps nobody but extremists and increases the chance of terrorism because the extremists are armed with more and the moderates become weakened.
                      Which was exactly why NLUK asked you to suggest something that doesn't hurt the faith. And you have totally failed to do so since you already know the answer that you don't have an answer.

                      Let us put this question to you again - What title would you suggest?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X