• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Rehabilitation of Offenders

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Your objection to people protesting about clubs wanting to take him on appears to be because you believe he was wrongly convicted.
    No, my objection disregarded it.

    However when I looked at details of the case I am now seriously wondering if this conviction is beyond reasonable doubt.

    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    The facts are that he is a convicted rapist.
    For now he is, but there were people who got convicted for murders and did many years in jail before they got released as innocent. Given that he did not plead guilty I think it's reasonable to give him benefit of the doubt in my view.

    Either way mob rule isn't acceptable, I am not saying he was convicted due to mob rule, but he is certainly being prevented from being reintegrated to society by the mob rule.
    Last edited by AtW; 12 January 2015, 17:55.

    Comment


      He is eligible to work, he has served the prison time required and wants to work. He is being stopped by baying mob.


      The conviction has always looked a bit odd.

      Comment


        So you would rather not see a convicted rapist who has been freed from prison to resume his career as a footballer because he is a rapist.

        But... A footballer who kills two children its ok

        Would you also be happy that this convicted rapist served you or the female members of your family in Tesco? or at the forecourt garage? Or collected your bins on a dark Friday morning from your house?

        come on...

        Comment


          Originally posted by turbowoowoo View Post
          So you would rather not see a convicted rapist who has been freed from prison to resume his career as a footballer because he is a rapist.

          But... A footballer who kills two children its ok
          Yep because there is a difference in their attitudes - linky

          Originally posted by turbowoowoo View Post
          Would you also be happy that this convicted rapist served you or the female members of your family in Tesco? or at the forecourt garage? Or collected your bins on a dark Friday morning from your house?

          come on...
          You aren't comparing like with like.

          Sex offenders have more restrictions on them working with people than someone who causes death by dangerous driving.

          A sex offender isn't allowed to work with children and vulnerable people. if the sex offender raped/sexually assaulted adult women then employers also have a duty of care to their female employees, so depending on the number of women and type of role it was they simply wouldn't be employed.

          So a sex offender wouldn't be employed to work employed to work in a Tescos store or to collect the bins. They could however be employed at some warehouses and at a recycling centre to sort rubbish.
          "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

          Comment


            Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
            Yep because there is a difference in their attitudes - linky
            Yes, for sure. One has killed two children (which is something beyond reasonable doubt) and probably said "I am very very sorry!", and the other one had sex with a drunk girl who later said she did not give consent, he maintains his innocence and served time in jail... is it fundamentally wrong to maintain ones innocence despite attractiveness of choosing to plea guilty?

            Comment


              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              Yes, for sure. One has killed two children (which is something beyond reasonable doubt) and probably said "I am very very sorry!", and the other one had sex with a drunk girl who later said she did not give consent, he maintains his innocence and served time in jail... is it fundamentally wrong to maintain ones innocence despite attractiveness of choosing to plea guilty?
              Chef Evans is a typical sex offender who refuses to acknowledge and admit they have done wrong. They are actually one of the worse groups of criminals for doing this.

              One of the first steps to being rehabilitated is to admit you have done wrong so you can change your behaviour, and who you associate with so you won't do the same thing again. While you are unlikely to have killed people drunk and in your car before, you are very likely to have committed similar sex offences before.

              You need to be aware that people get caught committing crimes by the police but the CPS often doesn't prosecute offences due to them deciding there is not enough evidence, deciding the victim isn't good enough to go to court and/or the perpetrator's age. The CPS has actually had to pay compensation to victims of sex offences due to this. This case probably wouldn't have gone to court without the witnesses and the men involved behaviour.

              In short if a person (as men get raped as well ) is too intoxicated to stand up on their own don't have sex with them.
              "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

              Comment


                Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                Chef Evans is a typical sex offender who refuses to acknowledge and admit they have done wrong. They are actually one of the worse groups of criminals for doing this.
                But surely a killer of 2 children is much much worse than what he did?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  But surely a killer of 2 children is much much worse than what he did?
                  It's about which ex-con is likely to do the same thing again.
                  "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                    It's about which ex-con is likely to do the same thing again.
                    Is it really?

                    So this guy is more likely to rape it again if he does NOT get a football job that pays well, instead he'd be more likely to be a law abiding citizen who stays all his life on unemployment benefits?

                    Comment


                      My personal experience with the legal system and profession leads me to doubt they could find their rear end with a lit firework poking out of it. That is if they could take time off from invoicing their grandmother.

                      He is unable to say sorry for committing a crime if he is pleading innocence. He may not want to if he believes himself innocent. He & his friend testified he had consent.

                      The reason he wasn't granted an appeal because there is no new evidence, there is no mechanism for retrying a case because they got it wrong.

                      Miscarriage of justice - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


                      now is he an immoral scumbag almost certainly yes. Would I warn my daughters about people like him - definitely. Do I want to see him locked up for an offence I'm not certain he committed - no.

                      Do I want to prevent him working when he is legally allowed to because I think I know better? - no

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X