Originally posted by JoeyD
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Ukip mistakes Westminster Cathedral for a mosque
Collapse
X
-
Nah we have enough Polish and other Eastern Europeans to keep Catholicism alive....."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
Of the many things that UKIP are accused of, travelling forwards in time isn't generally one of them.Originally posted by JoeyD View PostSimple explanation. They had traveled forward in time 10 years, to when it IS a mosque.Comment
-
And Orthodox! Which is like Catholicism but without the preaching and the guilt.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostNah we have enough Polish and other Eastern Europeans to keep Catholicism alive.....Comment
-
I think you rather know what he meant, unless you meant this as an English/Scottish thing?Originally posted by minestrone View PostAs a practicing Catholic I can assure you there is no such thing as a "primary place of worship for British catholic Christians"Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
That might be right. However I would vote for the party most likely to stir up the current duopoly. Politics needs a big shake up.Originally posted by NickFitz View Post(And yes, I know the Brighton Pavilion thing was the EDL; but if you think there's any significant difference between them and UKIP, you're seriously deluded.)Comment
-
I rather think by definition any party outside the duopoly who gets in will fulfil that ambition.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostThat might be right. However I would vote for the party most likely to stir up the current duopoly. Politics needs a big shake up.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I certainly hope for another hung Parliament. Even if its the SNP holding the balance of power.Originally posted by d000hg View PostI rather think by definition any party outside the duopoly who gets in will fulfil that ambition.Comment
-
So now the argument has become UKIP = EDL and if you disagree you're delusional. Cool beans. Reality can take a backseat. Meanwhile, where does this leave the other 3 parties copying it at every step?Originally posted by NickFitz View PostFirst the Brighton Pavilion, now Westminster Cathedral. As a group who claim to have such a big thing about the UK, you'd think they'd know something about the place
(And yes, I know the Brighton Pavilion thing was the EDL; but if you think there's any significant difference between them and UKIP, you're seriously deluded.)Comment
-
You will find similar number of idiots among supporters of other parties, it's just that only the left need to keep pointing these mistakes out because they are devoid of any more rational, fact based argument. It is observable on here that, if one cites proper evidence from reputable sources on immigration or other contentious issues, it rarely gets any comment.
Those with more extreme views are also an essential part of real democracy because they are part of the normal distribution and will also support more moderate policies. If you arbitrarily exclude one end of that distribution you shift the mean over and necessarily impact those of more moderate views. Personally I would rather see proper reforms in the EU, including a slower integration that does not treat real problems of ordinary people with such disdain, than see the UK leaving. However, that will never happen without the threat from UKIP and other European right wing parties.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Like Migration Watch? A private lobbying company who are discounted by politicians both on the left and right of the debate.Originally posted by xoggoth View PostYou will find similar number of idiots among supporters of other parties, it's just that only the left need to keep pointing these mistakes out because they are devoid of any more rational, fact based argument. It is observable on here that, if one cites proper evidence from reputable sources on immigration or other contentious issues, it rarely gets any comment.
Mind you I like the fact Churchill and Prince Charles are "hidden" migrants."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment