Ukip mistakes Westminster Cathedral for a mosque

[Batcher]

As a practicing Catholic

Really? What were you doing in George Square on September 19th waving your Union flag, singing about being "up to your knees in fenian blood" and shouting "***** the Pope"?

You Unionists are seriously confused.

[DodgyAgent]

First the Brighton Pavilion, now Westminster Cathedral. As a group who claim to have such a big thing about the UK, you'd think they'd know something about the place

(And yes, I know the Brighton Pavilion thing was the EDL; but if you think there's any significant difference between them and UKIP, you're seriously deluded.)

A pathetic smear. You guys are clearly petrified of UKIP messing up your gravy train

[xoggoth]

Like Migration Watch?

No, not like Migration watch. I know perfectly well that, if one quotes Migration Watch or the Daily Mail etc, that in itself will be advanced as an "argument" by the leftist non-thinkers on here and that no other examination of the facts is necessary.

Just one example. Remember all that stuff about a lot of Romanian/Bulgarians coming here being denounced as hysteria because not many turned up in the first few days? Here is recent news from the BBC:

The number of migrants from Romania and Bulgaria working in the UK has increased again, official figures show.
The Office for National Statistics said there were 189,000 people born in one of the two countries who were in this category from July to September.
This was up from 158,000 the previous quarter and 140,000 a year earlier

As for the long term consequences of low skilled immigration, another BBC article:

And that is, that if you look at the figures for the whole of the period under study, 1995-2011, immigration has been a drain on the public purse. To the tune of about £95bn.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-25880373

[DodgyAgent]

Like Migration Watch? A private lobbying company who are discounted by politicians both on the left and right of the debate.

Mind you I like the fact Churchill and Prince Charles are "hidden" migrants.

I don't know about UKIP being a bunch of thickos but what you fail to see is that the whole argument is about whether we let "more", "less" or "none" immigrants into the UK. The people who are already here like myself, prince Charles, Farage's wife are not the issue. Yet you keep trying to turn past migration into the issue. Why? Have you no rational arguments to put forward?

[JoeyD]

Really? What were you doing in George Square on September 19th waving your Union flag, singing about being "up to your knees in fenian blood" and shouting "***** the Pope"?

You Unionists are seriously confused.

Is that him at the front ?

[xoggoth]

and Prince Charles are "hidden" migrants

All in favour of deporting that twat!

[DodgyAgent]

All in favour of deporting that twat!

I have sent his CV to ISIL

[SueEllen]

No, not like Migration watch. I know perfectly well that, if one quotes Migration Watch or the Daily Mail etc, that in itself will be advanced as an "argument" by the leftist non-thinkers on here and that no other examination of the facts is necessary.

Just one example. Remember all that stuff about a lot of Romanian/Bulgarians coming here being denounced as hysteria because not many turned up in the first few days? Here is recent news from the BBC:

It was a scare because loads of them were already here picking crops and wiping bums.

The issue is now we get the ******* Roma as well as we are "nice" to them. Though at least other nice EU countries get them as well.

[Zero Liability]

Like Migration Watch? A private lobbying company who are discounted by politicians both on the left and right of the debate.

Mind you I like the fact Churchill and Prince Charles are "hidden" migrants.

What's the fact that it is 'private' or discounted by career slimeballs got to do with anything?

[SpontaneousOrder]

What's the fact that it is 'private' or discounted by career slimeballs got to do with anything?

I thought that 'private' lobbying was the whole point of democracy.